Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08 Sun, 14 February 2021 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95343A099F for <>; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 12:12:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.224
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.224 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kNj0F8UXDRYu for <>; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 12:12:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31EAF3A098C for <>; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 12:12:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP id BNhWlvsuufFsMBNlIlje54; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 20:12:56 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20180828_2048; t=1613333576; bh=HioRR+VZjzJq67UHB8Ay5eBMhJPw3LlJOEF0vMsZTFo=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=Az36eIiMfUf1dQXfR/jbvk2SF9bBA4mtL3/VbIUtaFAH92lQa0DsWe3cIsPApa+3z NIaIimXjZbnETeFk+207/ky6qNN/cBFoYxCxaxN7jRljpOpK3yhRdeMr1YzZSsWt3o wU7RCOrkOgpO43pD6HnUUGmlrbk1Fz4kuQbhW1XS6R2WT6ZZkv86YdKr0hU2N4FHaQ 9WUL51QRD3USk5auf2kzHAfeFoA2tnjUZlhZr+iDJLQSDHNKaDeY9tOBwpVIP9Kq2v h5pOPIC4y45IFbXp54WUueZbAhzigzpTJMBF4KfLKRtU30etRxTSFa0dgF/hGJiyB5 +iaStRHFp3OAA==
Received: from ([IPv6:2601:192:4a00:430:222:fbff:fe91:d396]) by with ESMTPA id BNlFlrQB4o85jBNlFlvtgb; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 20:12:55 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0.00;st=legit
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 11EKCqL2022125; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 15:12:52 -0500
Received: (from worley@localhost) by (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id 11EKCqq3022122; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 15:12:52 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: worley set sender to using -f
From: (Dale R. Worley)
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <>
In-Reply-To: <> (
Sender: (Dale R. Worley)
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 15:12:52 -0500
Message-ID: <>
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 20:12:59 -0000

My apologies for not replying to this sooner.

To give the TL;DR, I think the proposed changes adequately address my

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <> writes:
> In the interests of getting this document on its way, I'd like to suggest
> the following edits in response to Dale's most recent message.  If the
> working group concurs, we can finally get this out to Last Call.
> My goal as an AD here is just to get the GenART feedback addressed, but the
> text is being submitted as a WG contribution for discussion and consensus
> consideration, not as a demand.   Please process accordingly; I believe the
> agreement is to do another WGLC on the document before it goes on its way,
> so the sooner consensus is reached on all of this, the sooner it goes.

Yes, I've noticed that people (even authors) forget that Gen-Art
reviewers do not have veto power, they are just additional commentators.