Re: [dmarc-ietf] ABNF update to dmarc-psd

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Mon, 07 June 2021 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A858F3A1471 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 15:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3i-W9kHeiMer for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 15:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FFBC3A146E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 15:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id k15so14182836pfp.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 15:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=LdYjbeHTt8fc+Pj3Lnexi4oD/qBxt7sJR0ggYrVBWH0=; b=gMDOcOZlKrrR/YxRDvfNxnw9tO7XA+7//f9f3JZiMlxVlZI1iKsaITv714kgQCEI9p cN1urgqK5Z9KKzzefrULaDhBciWMRH4XNsZcQzK27PQFYch5PodlhmWHkRWCloL0Lju/ S8dQVhpiubPnO6W5beUrdAFXduJjYTTjZONW5Fu1zCZgSojTK4qZz+dLLK1BR6vSz7Xl sFZJAdg/3Sj3DLS3c9rl+sUbxbXuTVXW5wZ+sdx8cSurok5Penc808J+h6HU8xJnY1gS cSZ5A9uhyNp7u2mQuw7APNzDSA/mNy/ShfTtsIWgTHj0tRA9WwOYzday57e3evlEUTzz h1sQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=LdYjbeHTt8fc+Pj3Lnexi4oD/qBxt7sJR0ggYrVBWH0=; b=eyxguNkawvOYSFN8UwMVxmpq+l2//rEJruvOHKNKpze8FAMw3GT1vIMLmc95Zxr7II vevRR1KZuWaIfJsPaMz9nf3oeGK1Xl+WIIY+MeY+rbfSO7lOwJ5KpE/G5SywTRxUI0tC PwecEAjkApIkP2CL6nIDDRjYYJouLV7EzZKbObnn4e9WzCTiYPOTgDN9MKJR2ZvhUahu 4kzPEAeWLq2keB9UCF46f+f5dhusgdYkoaU5yPvNQf+96acxqdfGz99B55RHgnd6BPO4 jbshBjGQwPUT1kDlX9oJd31yWhkNugD5hTn0EZ2frYwppvr+oPqgeR3O4caU/lyir/hd RRig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533k+3QBiYx0Nx2q5/qtDozedU/zAVOd1f4C8Hgm+80RY8sC4P9w dPI+Q+SWiYAnBOZJ4S/W1EBrKvsDnHEPMg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyOjdGz/lUxaqDLgO3+e0CD8wknJm6lwUf/PnpPk4O0oxaRsCVph88G7Z+NTgTW/smke5eAOw==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:93b8:0:b029:2e9:df8c:d5e0 with SMTP id x24-20020aa793b80000b02902e9df8cd5e0mr19334213pff.19.1623104779865; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 15:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.106] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.62.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c190sm8803941pfc.26.2021.06.07.15.26.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Jun 2021 15:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <CADyWQ+FkHUr1DPHpepFU=1_HQi3hOKvSe3bvb4QC+cOqy-OGEg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b81542f9-b04c-f815-dfab-61e649f578e8@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 15:26:17 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+FkHUr1DPHpepFU=1_HQi3hOKvSe3bvb4QC+cOqy-OGEg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------6AD66B1FF2CB5B19F5DF21F4"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/rkOfLGzz2RgzStUHG13s9rc37OM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ABNF update to dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 22:26:27 -0000

On 6/7/2021 3:10 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>      dmarc-nprequest =  "np" *WSP "=" *WSP
>          ( "none" / "quarantine" / "reject" )

I suggest adding a comment that makes the linkage of 'nprequest' to the 
prose text explicit.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@gmail.com
408.329.0791

Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
Information & Planning Coordinator
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@redcross.org