Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Wed, 17 July 2019 04:15 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A247120058 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=E/lFvAnJ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=AmROEdW5
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5PEoZOGQapEO for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1F41120125 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DDB2F805B5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:15:01 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1563336900; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=FUBeTlaqtiHu8HmReliilmzUBvkpLmitVl0W20o0tdM=; b=E/lFvAnJRsLOKNvXJMiPbwj2P8/wgbzGCr2n3MrWrgtxm6p1ZpnLU6lD ZMo/udUc73fWG23wJRuSpnVolhM7Dg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1563336900; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=FUBeTlaqtiHu8HmReliilmzUBvkpLmitVl0W20o0tdM=; b=AmROEdW5pgW56mH0d4F/0spKVZo+z58nwd5xm6hBxRXomeF08oeOVRYA 3AxHY/Bb8GWyJxMtWnwEqtf/o8JGYhgfnkluu3FOGNhlBY+70jYMj51fkr gzY8YaGAsh8F1ywNTkbDxc32Tx96APJKXp/ye0ipYtxd0oUwDxKUNiOXYf w0vQR6mlo080WYKA1I//mKIzFV5ttabYTFZQb8PZlAi671Y304S7A72EXj GWDInEQoAfL6hbi1RTC+bP6D6ivHV2mUXxZlrzHqRYP8sH5HOQeeQvVUnV /im7AhsbhU06Je9cvFZlgvXUu4fo6Cpu4DtVsRnc5v4jZ6aysD/dcw==
Received: from l5580.localnet (wsip-68-224-171-140.sd.sd.cox.net [68.224.171.140]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C08D7F8008C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:15:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:14:55 -0400
Message-ID: <2709814.l7omtmZ8hE@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+EKBE3uJGziWi+8aV_Ya+WFJ23e-HAudMwSmV-6fHpzSw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwbbz_UhBLsURg=eXhRBC2g9OghiN==T9Uq9pFuLtd=b7w@mail.gmail.com> <1958020.28HeBAo97T@l5580> <CADyWQ+EKBE3uJGziWi+8aV_Ya+WFJ23e-HAudMwSmV-6fHpzSw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/sC3ZbQkevMPBmy9cH9Yf744hFwI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 04:15:06 -0000

I was slightly more verbose.  I'll send the updated diff for 'np' once I get 
through my email backlog.

Scott K

On Monday, July 15, 2019 8:30:35 AM EDT Tim Wicinski wrote:
> I totally agree with the logic behind the experiment.
> 
> >From a document point of view, should we not document the 'np' part of the
> 
> experiment?
> 
> "The experiment will also evaluate the effectiveness of the 'np' tag for
> non-existent subdomains. "
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 2:28 PM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>;
> 
> wrote:
> > On Friday, July 12, 2019 1:54:57 PM EDT Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:50 AM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>;
> > > 
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:21:14 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote:
> > > > > 3. If an np= tag is needed to allow PSD functioning for only
> > 
> > NXDOMAINs
> > 
> > > > The limited feedback during WGLC has been favorable to this.
> > > > 
> > > > This will require a rather larger change to the document than the
> > > > other
> > > > issues, but they are manageable and I believe I have most of the
> > 
> > relevant
> > 
> > > > text
> > > > from earlier revisions.
> > > > 
> > > > I think we should include this.
> > > 
> > > I am much more concerned with adding another tag that can only be used
> > 
> > in a
> > 
> > > PSD-DMARC record. I would be much more open to make a "normative" change
> > 
> > to
> > 
> > > the DMARC tag list (RFC 7489 section 11.4) to define np for any DMARC
> > > record, than to make this a special case for PSD-DMARC records.
> > 
> > I agree.  My intent is to add the tag to be used experimentally for any
> > DMARC
> > record.  Part of the experiment is to see if it's useful beyond PSD.
> > 
> > Scott K
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > dmarc mailing list
> > dmarc@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc