IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Wed, 23 December 2020 20:03 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477013A09C6 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:03:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2vdFq8p8FFZy for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:03:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 800B63A0994 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:03:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id q5so171788ilc.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:03:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/NYQL92puAaZPdVN5md3FwQGB+CgKIRpzds8Gyl0dCk=; b=KgkkdXtJxvjBeFlp4TSGoObzddYsgE2WNnsPW5UotA7Y83nkVoiP7C/hnlqjYTlGZK etVBvckvITKUZVUdqVor4rORDtRQR++RuyDOSbbqfK3NPepFeLwwTu1aJSjBHW2eTtKQ 85xGRAXBi+JR+XTFUneMQRbBtpBYO0SxIr4Nc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/NYQL92puAaZPdVN5md3FwQGB+CgKIRpzds8Gyl0dCk=; b=cUaX0TaonMv97QCtL2iXP1uSLI4zEry1w11uEeOoZVjjVa3Y07mdsMrOKgdR+Rvv9o 8osrpaX/uBQuiEucxnsX3uk6+aqftraT2iZp3wGMLRoFJ/3F3XswHlt35h78+3ELXGvx wMxjYG05gvzR12Mab2hn3NhXe0VZDxdfRK5R4Q4lhwmLkFAzvA/k6O0WK+na1P83bxuk af/iOxjTco9K75qwoVJJLY54r2KP2UbDX+CFbRtr/wfYqo3GAGLidmfKaSIa9+Nr+Flo 3YmvVQZv/31F2TA9cAgU3MtvY+CS9Q0rMI9JhJUzypn7IVZ41hz4QmeKB6sFHX1IxSo8 LR3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533sSNDbslK3jYAdSefwwKiCnUzQiYVgpJlzoqtW1g2G6WHZ94OR NY6AWIC0K4JAJIMUztoleDeFGBcWAEk9GeUIz9O66tVQKg/9Ww==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyx+UVHQB+7fGnajFen9zLmkM0J6kdFPb0bCwnS//QeBUZvdRtC/GX1ZOyMKl6aB4BYOJEx3ia+XMntKot9nHM=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:9f15:: with SMTP id u21mr28614607ili.120.1608753820685; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:03:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201218023900.E73B82ACBB2B@ary.qy> <4a43ffaa-3987-c892-cce7-56f18888cdf5@tana.it> <39125012-e356-d62d-36fd-a7ff25a9f59f@taugh.com> <e6880ba9-f5f3-1050-25c0-658551187512@tana.it> <6bba023-d3d9-63a5-8441-11dac9a05e28@taugh.com> <74051a64-871a-db72-b5d9-1be374e23015@tana.it> <a323077-9b64-555b-3561-62cdc93819fd@taugh.com> <a8281e16-9417-5189-df73-79ea0a865fbd@tana.it> <c713b9ae-a364-1ae0-e79-55f61624aa3d@taugh.com> <3034face-b6fc-0ce2-fa1b-f59210bd6f5b@tana.it> <46339b38-3b24-bcb7-5e73-8a97038ed69@taugh.com> <3997c81d-3b30-0823-a752-fb1d60a44593@tana.it> <74a5c37-19a6-6f6f-a51d-6e5cca5b29e8@taugh.com> <CAJ4XoYdXWTgADpdL1eJuYGnpSY038vj-FW_x1f2rEp1JL0r2oA@mail.gmail.com> <01RTICXKLL3E0085YQ@mauve.mrochek.com> <c5f7413e-52c1-6710-16e5-63f59d2c24b9@taugh.com>
In-Reply-To: <c5f7413e-52c1-6710-16e5-63f59d2c24b9@taugh.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:03:28 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1qYWOO8xk3kvu=zG5O0SgBiv9CpjzjuWEvFgf1BS2gJKg@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000003702d05b72730f9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/sUYTsigWJRUMszpMqBpmmvUWlt0>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 20:03:43 -0000

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:10 AM John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, Ned Freed wrote:
> >  Failure reports provide detailed information about the failure of a
> single
> >  message or a group of similar messages failing for the same reason. They
> >  are meant to aid in cases where a domain owner is unable to detect why
> >  failures reported in aggregate form did occur. It is important to note
> >  these reports can contain either the header or the entire content of a
> >  failed message, which in turn may contain personally identifiable
> >  information, which should be considered when decoding whether or not to
> >  generate such reports.
>
> Ship it.
>

With one minor correction, I agree. The minor correction is in the last
sentence: s/decoding/deciding/

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email