IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF 109 possible agenda/session discussion

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 17 November 2020 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CBB3A0EDF; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:10:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZxUuoR1wB9BI; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:10:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa34.google.com (mail-vk1-xa34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55E093A0EDE; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:10:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa34.google.com with SMTP id o73so23803vka.5; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:10:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=k/XSypiCu95ghsIOnln3SITdANvmcy3lWY/i17SJJiI=; b=cASvjcps6U4PNHbLAsWLRUlw34/IwhsdcjX0mXy05DbDtb8ufu484Z/uDMs050ksJE w6oRX7qrw/uOglI7tmXrdl4rTT2a3RILrnwLUiErRw+Y0W+YYOA5xXS7ODAs2NovqQ+y 4dM1NyTzRhpnCYGladzeVUUvpTB8sbje8k5SRyiw9Zn44YMWlIg8HTaiZbo5s3OLggzP C5m7mg8pWuz1U+rLT4mcfnTOpj3LO5sbQUOedjig5TPFUhriMa0gd7d5AexeS2lNZt2g O4cG7t8q/WVbQSj75fpaIikbBnb2OBsRZU+TYd3z8QX1tP65/PnJoNxt2E1P1sB0fz36 7xcA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k/XSypiCu95ghsIOnln3SITdANvmcy3lWY/i17SJJiI=; b=bOHnb3sm0yK9FHp0gE4SFek5MY/0W44kPZaLjpUu/5m8iw4xgCN1etw8Z90VPMgYPO L97Oe2Exo69Raw+BZomNdM8Pp3fLwlae/6R5fTgmeJB9UBF0q4Z2uwD85B8KUECmgK0Z tT4491okXKntt0L0BWC9d91b0g+RCAG0lQm3xOd8PrQ7DbdevR/MDgcqDTZIL9cUJ+Fx 0Lz744+z0eJW+i7WYzm9J007TLgbTHEl8P3+Q7Q7zGeIk7xb/qmh0VWZYtVaay6OBJA1 F7jaE4xOOC9cpyKVZ+wwL5HI6wlDyJdrGFYQFmkes3lXZVMXJ5GjSfLeFMAkJmZWTIvl r0pw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531mzwWQthXFLcgvxc50TywDK0lvAMfmNI8CJlZ8lhTgXPZhPhQE 3IdWGuaI5H0WsUKn0LbKGR5O7HJs/f1Zg3JWorI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/zxZ1zCFUFbWv6vrqwShnfTGGRvpFE9QSb9xWspgDCI6hu/Uhe9nMZCNNGlxoUDNVMspv0/pIlyFZx5wYcDg=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:3655:: with SMTP id d82mr1441217vka.22.1605654601257; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:10:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+F9zJuMoWJV7Rp3fVjESdB4N4dE-AjJjh82Satd6br-tQ@mail.gmail.com> <801158ba-fcef-1bf3-497a-89e08c0005ec@dcrocker.net> <CADyWQ+FMfFeaOR8nBzSSZagp_msoDz9LfWfz-iZ+hKGgycWAOw@mail.gmail.com> <9BAE8F43-9B78-4352-A111-9549B7C46EDB@bluepopcorn.net> <CAL0qLwagPQrfBZS+YgJJaPWr161vPz3cLHQ8Ltqa=dutMB6mtA@mail.gmail.com> <d862f3f5-d127-f10f-8860-8875d8b3b9e5@dcrocker.net> <CAJ4XoYdjKDpSz-__q8sZJsP9T7HR9y5TeMNBhMT5Ya6wq6NEyA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ4XoYdjKDpSz-__q8sZJsP9T7HR9y5TeMNBhMT5Ya6wq6NEyA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:09:49 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaa4wUuqB9GK-Kf+GJ72MMO4uhCYnDLZwJVQqdbn9Tgzw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave CROCKER <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, dmarc-chairs@ietf.org, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000023d96005b4559817"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/sYnphkgDcUnQJuCfasxn6KkvEpM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF 109 possible agenda/session discussion
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:10:04 -0000

Yes, I apologize for not getting back to the WG as promised.  The meeting
will proceed as scheduled.

-MSK, ART AD

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:10 PM Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> wrote:

> Considering that some of us have to be up in the wee hours to participate,
> it would be nice to know whether it is happening or cancelled. Just saying.
> If the agenda is that light weight I may skip it even if held.
>
> Michael Hammer.
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:35 PM Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>
>> On 11/16/2020 10:46 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> > I'm discussing this with the chairs and they or I will get back to you
>> > shortly.
>>
>>
>> Forgive me, but this is all a bit nuts.
>>
>> Very few days before the scheduled session, we get a query about
>> canceling it, though the query also included a fresh, 'lightweight'
>> agenda.
>>
>> A couple of responses are posted, stating a preference for cancellation,
>> with no immediate responses choosing having the meeting (though today,
>> some have).
>>
>> We are now less than 12 hours from the scheduled time and still have not
>> received a definitive decision by the chairs.
>>
>> d/
>>
>> --
>> Dave Crocker
>> Brandenburg InternetWorking
>> bbiw.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmarc mailing list
>> dmarc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email