IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) - With Interim Notes

Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> Thu, 17 June 2021 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <todd.herr@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651EC3A2036 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J5ct8CJcU0Qi for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 926073A2013 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id u20so4728882qtx.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=YLX8SIF1SQIaVs6/aRZO2FncGj1giGgpo3zCzMi+hl4=; b=Ri/MgwAP15VMfeOeXBNXSbE9kebeI6H6NKkka4Mg/agSBHnzSR/lblUNV4oZ9LkZ8F LyGR0ZXyInAAfoV1+hwGC0U2dJ7ZVt0A3rmsv5uld9Xes90vWfTaCGtew5TxhpaTJGj6 fyGiY/sWXLIsIuLkO6uHQFVY7CkFGHZvgHonG7CpoMAjXAFv1cvz947V5u0oCM0tzhfs 6Yg9f5lXCZTZG+MXpyGuxmP72ok4AktTpFa37mJ1WQ6v8OWIHb8hRk7UdYlX+RqFhgif f+bFTpudVgo2K5EKs26ZUslknXj864BOS1CKoj+Pl0H0m/7R/hj10a7qM0F4EiCQF/VB EhVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=YLX8SIF1SQIaVs6/aRZO2FncGj1giGgpo3zCzMi+hl4=; b=GUEFU+eCRBsbNpXmKQMsWItsgg8SLOCXyXGN6HO2/XZ8O8TsnIre8J8rx+OxNfsi48 u8R14y6JfKrH+Kil2aKvnqVVlXySMaKPaiCVC+tEHkHA3EfGcuuIZwlrZ24OLmI8Cvio /YEvYgpw8iiMlX4THl7G11X3lkTFU255WJ9xj2xOYDOiGvpNtHiKwDACKbfn6ZgkTsEB eDwad440zC6lnor3JrFYqitCCxi15kqCT2aVYLFR9jgsCOpXR4g07rW+VaX+xSFErNEB +AA4sfNN8G6fzUDiigx2GrvXR95a0TO9HLCEzyprP29dkouYrRXW+GbK18/CwnePgGol PhDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532TbjxYl6oLteGqiqqAcEBipYu6a1gn3AUqe5/YKmmQKC6c5zMu 5wWEsiLPgn9/I3XNeatX4KuyCHon7BR37hVs71cJ0mFrMeVFBg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyT70z0gJB5aFtqdS/3LGocaz635DYsXLe5/NuEhTDiV8SJ+8Wjj5A7JMwqkEcWjJCWhDVFKbqdLq7FYEsqAw=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:74d3:: with SMTP id j19mr5228417qtr.208.1623937131876; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHej_8kfk=-RT0bgsiRqoEJNXXzqSYvxgfBwqYnXxGUquisyjw@mail.gmail.com> <ee3d7541-db25-e3d6-be79-434b2f8c2244@crash.com>
In-Reply-To: <ee3d7541-db25-e3d6-be79-434b2f8c2244@crash.com>
From: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:38:36 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHej_8kJ6Artj0rb+kabnC3j8ChQQeckW5pDsAdKtyoyu-gnpA@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e2387505c4f653af"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/sp8NDGkxFDINoPx7Ylq2Uw2HnAc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) - With Interim Notes
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:39:09 -0000

I have closed the subject ticket and incorporated relevant text
changes in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-02,
which will be published on Datatracker as soon as the chairs have a chance
to do so.

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:30 PM Steven M Jones <smj@crash.com> wrote:

> On 5/28/21 08:43, Todd Herr wrote:
>
>
> Consensus on Ticket #50 <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/50>
> (Remove ri= tag) was reached during the May 27 DMARC Interim to remove the
> tag and update the IANA registry to reflect its removal.
>
>
> I support removing the tag from the specification, but following TIm
> Wisnewski suggestion to mark the tag as "historic" in the IANA registry.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>


-- 

*Todd Herr* | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem
*e:* todd.herr@valimail.com
*m:* 703.220.4153

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email