IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliot's review of the DMARC spec

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 05 July 2013 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42A521F9EB2 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 12:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m46XCVEmKykW for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 12:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE1621F9EAF for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 12:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id ey16so8512536wid.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 12:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Cwp0oi1gmZzUlKZr0UPw41fcKPzCVY4DfLWwLquP468=; b=NNlV7A8LYK/+PgDypkFrx9051f/4OxS+tLlrJyjSlkyHWqO9MW01J5QGtor04vCGrR revN9EVF+qmylHVrsbWZqXYYwVT37HaSRVVrmZOFwyqoxCqcX5vle2eyGPGzJ8jddflR Y9rdctbGk16/mURtyDjJztYHlWNbZX7eDVhb2YCENKLKNRm8rVBJTlsDKX8Fv1nWvCqp eCOIekCUrWcoK0vw3xLK5pktlOOWFLqMw6S1yxJTvZUNKLrj5iU/5p+gKlt06Z9px1JS RN1C8uYINWiwv1GUPP3evS0D3UWoPWEbrpImPGfN+eVzY3AU2s40FI3aL/XaVXtdET8a G2Kw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.239.225 with SMTP id vv1mr6872860wjc.63.1373051431246; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 12:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.90.16 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 12:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130705185220.28629.qmail@joyce.lan>
References: <CAL0qLwZfEadbB+piza=w8Z=78Y-XicSQ1BXyRz=iNr_XcTK8-g@mail.gmail.com> <20130705185220.28629.qmail@joyce.lan>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 12:10:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZ+e1h4rZAZxtO53KygfcMpAaNgTNDG0S+MNf4o=xfxMQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01493384d15ef304e0c87257"
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Eliot's review of the DMARC spec
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 19:10:32 -0000

Wasn't it this?
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmarc/current/msg00292.html

I don't have anything from him prior to that.


On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 11:52 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> >>  I've been asked to take a look at the DMARC spec.
>
> Your original note with the comments never made it to the DMARC list
> (I checked the archives.)  Could someone send it along so we don't
> have to reverse engineer it from the meta-comments?
>
> Tnx.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email