IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Tue, 18 August 2020 01:09 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258443A1578 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.046
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.046 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 88PB6Z90LpMZ for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D963B3A1577 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id 17so9115055pfw.9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=yO+JYGHLPW+pMEjcIcrMA0uVmxQL3Nf5Wm6YbpXSvMc=; b=j9lvHwohQlQn0Lu1euSkDALeZ8Id1u9v8/IpB/vZyjo4YvG9VwzjDY66uC2oI4Gv4z SEM6FN3+FTBAF7A36TdY8q4GZd3+3jvy5CNZFQsC0Ygpf4xsRwVEA2xx1qMhbWJwMGWM ieRgbqWN/gHIA1j+GvwPmQXPkZmHoxizzMLjWl2EAw5F5JzHskCoacDV2IWh4s9KH3/e m3mwY47yPJ41l3TVcDyHczHa20Msrq8DjS4IYDIM1bgKHfWmHbkfdxrM9cGxGVtyXEJN XRM2xAJMIi6faCGr1CgTkyOexqzE+IOIGScz871AtNl90FaWcZUA0kE5WzuHkGXBuLsE uHkw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=yO+JYGHLPW+pMEjcIcrMA0uVmxQL3Nf5Wm6YbpXSvMc=; b=NlI3u6CAVFv8XAdcQm9p89TVPYYYi97XfJqU/7htLS4f7tQt/EmoQ0OTHSzCrwevGr YMtfpNISoXa9B3urzBtRIIjUak5iCBPNio/BuU5mImhJvMWLiQNKhn/pV6IfAFQLGjw9 KJg53Z16AvW5ccotZfGgOjl2CCRIRa44p3Kku8MuVAQzy9GFZ6JGPWUnUFhUeLXXQYhm jg+Fmjl+cRPxMvb8+kds5DpeCqa1Lxw1xM7wEwxO542prdlrUC3i2TzBCYoKsxPuZt7y cBVGQXGAi8BxQGfYdsad93w6ul1GawzI6cFPFOtcPhkDVq9O8oTGtND89gWsT80JWM+E Fsgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532MY9gyso6/EOdvJYqXnJfFRb9l4AaU8qvhFNIZFQErr1oNGQZu qv6iEzV4RGOrF2ugl01wonAWtb0CRp4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwoxx/eF2yoovdSe/m0VBxXoDFTqUn5+JxsEuxXyE4UrnKkU7Q9PxXbbr79EMHTIUpWnpwcEQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:4183:: with SMTP id a3mr11360845pgq.448.1597712969144; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (c-73-158-217-238.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.158.217.238]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b26sm21904074pff.54.2020.08.17.18.09.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:09:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <20200810172411.A13681E7CD8B@ary.local> <7e9326fc-ae27-d4bd-9f2b-9896da8320f1@dcrocker.net> <CAL0qLwacyBbJscEM_a4-nvugO0HBaSAdPqUPkfYYOOb++cOjQQ@mail.gmail.com> <5F396A77.3000109@isdg.net> <366e50ed8bda41cb879fa245e2d7c27a@bayviewphysicians.com> <CAJ4XoYev1WG8jWckSbkRmgxnJ1pM_CfM6-0Mhg9E6LraH1noyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZpGbr3Cv3_3tzERP8fx8u1fuMJ+ZS8W_=9jtqVAjgD8w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20ad2821-f705-d8d6-2921-a419e1bd0554@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:09:27 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZpGbr3Cv3_3tzERP8fx8u1fuMJ+ZS8W_=9jtqVAjgD8w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------0F20488A30C52ABE57C2BB21"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/stfJa8jb0i2yn3bxpPBmvBvDA60>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Time for a change
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:09:31 -0000

>  DKIM was a synthesis within the IETF of two things (DomainKeys and 
> IIM) that started outside.  It underwent significant evolution in the 
> IETF -- not once, but twice.

Actually, it wasn't.

The constituent parts were separately proposed, during the same initial 
IETF discussions, and the IETF said to go away and come back after 
reconciliation.  That work was done by an ad hoc industry team and there 
was a complete spec and initial implementations before the IETF was 
again approached.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allman-dkim-base-00

(and note that in the working group field on the title page, it says 
"pre-MASS"...)

The work in the IETF was a refinement of a complete, integrated spec.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email