Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 13 April 2023 16:44 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF06C14CE38 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.096, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QDJVt2X_FW_v for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-f48.google.com (mail-ej1-f48.google.com [209.85.218.48]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2263DC152A14 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-f48.google.com with SMTP id qb20so38556367ejc.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1681404241; x=1683996241; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=NasnAMTwAGIwU5UWl0ENGoUHxzY+2JuIHpqG92hblqE=; b=jyrD7mCl6IDgblpL8b7xRRPPGV6l6YlvShyfGaaJzkmOvlBe/gdDMuvnD1hNgNW8Vz lZUF4KxpkAlRbaOTAeMm8gP1nqxg3nuaUNhwelokzwDirZ/sbfDKiIX7axYANX9UHAC0 haVj/xGjdRRMeUBfre1qWpZsruDrecmLm5ijj2EnYtbXqfOafOJ7bxfZJSxsxI1tBu0r 4NT/ctbDSMABv0LUC+Z/TVQFEuMrsxxFBKRnwMQrNhuIOhUme+EAfyPrQvgdKaMRwQLD KYJapYCROZfDAYp2XwoD2m8RvKTFetVHd/Kz9mpO6qTNlDlCT/xIYPgLabrRcIYwuz5m mAfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9dhSr7bGoZJ9+qeOQe4cL9+Bf9eBON+pITGKx1fwgpeeVDT6XIM FpiqJge3Tx4hnt+RM8ldnrr1EwP4VKWeu19ZsKQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZDpz4xxs701hk/qEAOcQs1MY1qXK/5ROP3JU+kfteD0JppTpvqKRjhPADE67TreCHpbz6PdGI87oaGOzUeM74=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3286:b0:932:e546:b8bb with SMTP id 6-20020a170906328600b00932e546b8bbmr1622297ejw.0.1681404241196; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwYbbLLq-qLg_Wnp5aFw_2my4UTZz3U3LjwbCmpMNdudfA@mail.gmail.com> <20230413151342.B96D0BF17F1F@ary.qy> <CALaySJKM5Kct0u0ekuEBS=DVQTXG_CiewpzNwVyPiAaQ9zx3VA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHej_8nyYrCXPo8aYOb+cVSf=2NQDOBmUgo-FD=ohPBZ=yFuHw@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+6JxGua90o8kgyoFH48swn6f0g8x+Jx4By4jQnC7ot8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ4XoYddHX20JOJfURAsVhpzi6HobX90qim=5Zw2jpbq5KsNJw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ4XoYddHX20JOJfURAsVhpzi6HobX90qim=5Zw2jpbq5KsNJw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 12:43:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJJO=Cp4s+LY9R7dCbao5P9N82n_r1qG7v7iKYmRymSX0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
Cc: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dmarc@ietf.org, superuser@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000085433f05f93a6e80"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/sufyL__MP31yRq8GUqmAOWOBiqY>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just MLMs
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 16:44:07 -0000
We can say that as well, but I want to specifically say "don't use SPF without DKIM and expect it to work right;" b On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 12:41 PM Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 12:19 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> > wrote: > >> Maybe just add a sentence to the end of the second paragraph: >> >> The use of SPF alone, without DKIM, is strongly NOT RECOMMENDED. >> >> Barry >> > > I think the opposite. Something along the lines of "Sending domains SHOULD > implement both SPF and DKIM to minimize breakage and non-delivery of mail. > > Michael Hammer > > >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 12:04 PM Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:21 AM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> > Anyone who does forwarding is damaged by DMARC because there are a >>>> lot of >>>> > people who do DMARC on the cheap with SPF only. >>>> >>>> This brings up another issue, I think: that there should also be >>>> stronger advice that using DKIM is critical to DMARC reliability, and >>>> using SPF only, without DKIM, is strongly NOT RECOMMENDED. >>>> >>>> I don't disagree. >>> >>> How do we make the following text stronger? >>> 5.5.2. >>> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-27.html#section-5.5.2>Configure >>> Sending System for DKIM Signing Using an Aligned Domain >>> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-27.html#name-configure-sending-system-fo> >>> >>> While it is possible to secure a DMARC pass verdict based on only one of >>> SPF or DKIM, it is commonly accepted best practice to ensure that both >>> authentication mechanisms are in place to guard against failure of just one >>> of them. >>> >>> This is particularly important because SPF will always fail in >>> situations where mail is sent to a forwarding address offered by a >>> professional society, school or other institution, where the address simply >>> relays the message to the recipient's current "real" address. Many >>> recipients use such addresses and with SPF alone and not DKIM, messages >>> sent to such users will always produce DMARC fail. >>> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-27.html#section-5.5.2-2> >>> >>> The Domain Owner SHOULD choose a DKIM-Signing domain (i.e., the d= >>> domain in the DKIM-Signature header) that aligns with the Author Domain. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> *Todd Herr * | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem >>> *e:* todd.herr@valimail.com >>> *m:* 703.220.4153 >>> >>> This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or >>> proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) >>> authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized >>> recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or >>> distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited >>> and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to >>> this email and then delete it from your system. >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc mailing list >> dmarc@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >> >
- [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Steven M Jones
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Mark Alley
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Brotman, Alex
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling forwarders, not just M… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Laura Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Give up on SPF alone Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Jesse Thompson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] list history, Signaling MLMs Wei Chuang
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Give up on SPF alone Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Neil Anuskiewicz
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Signaling MLMs Alessandro Vesely