Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-12.txt

Craig Schwartz <craig@ftld.com> Tue, 13 April 2021 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <craig@ftld.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205F33A12B5 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 05:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ftld.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Ax-Gvr339DT for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 05:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F5023A138A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 05:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id g18-20020a7bc4d20000b0290116042cfdd8so10573343wmk.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 05:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ftld.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Uuj4FW/sBopigyLDKfDkwxhRcXImwQFIPvAuZAY0EYI=; b=5vL7v3AVoAMEDkImaMQ3XqVIOmZP+VXz9PAgf2OCdQ/N/+k+MFHCc9HwijwOBCQSMl bOgcb73hyISh3vBy9WB7gCQzLRSy13Ndlhs8uoQ18pdOa9geipnkGU+ZEHNax5pl355R tZ+7wflSJYbC0zkuuryLqrodXytljOfbddTLQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Uuj4FW/sBopigyLDKfDkwxhRcXImwQFIPvAuZAY0EYI=; b=qBjb6BbnEYoPoszLPf3h3X/x6tIMJEwR1/31PS/a42BzqgVbLkv/lNNnncj100qThx vEa/IFLeWDFUuhbVfvfvg7CrSaxdTAYY17AafVqnx2/kpDsgsNHllsUIzIoVBlO7HRWB FP/RjSKYS5MPOm6H66rrW3rLfCBypDPv19iJKRUeUd5KiDGic9AY14itKGjsUavfRUrN CFK/dsVjdGQUMQudf0sYHoUHbGevKc1W0M3jDVRlEuSqkSuOMuiIgC/aRlGajBcnQF7G SSSdwX1y2DGIO6GjNPc3ZmnPD7B1Lm4jE2Ic60FUK8NClG8IecW36L4pnjdg9gZFxtFw hliA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533x/V3LdJXddMmEdHqzAo1Vw0+GC63jUVDWogF6ECjFr87pA68i AuXJGC+5qWWaIy/5WBNYnloTFzETjsPBzodrSfJz8pWKGo4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzMPOEpZM0b75+C29PRzK5hEkQfWSD8Uu0hKa0h7LHXB2kDhsIekb7CW8DkMekedxABxjwIJKkEUam5SEv9ez4=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:65c2:: with SMTP id z185mr3990171wmb.2.1618316860894; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 05:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161826631429.14511.7031457134724901407@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <161826631429.14511.7031457134724901407@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Craig Schwartz <craig@ftld.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:27:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ+U=1quZGuuwgq8q2jPsSGZDh=RSUeLD0u0eD1vgLa-wdQi1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Cc: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a0c2f505bfd9c1b0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/sxwk9p7NWx4I0Hh1UqPOBQIQ4AE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-12.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 12:27:54 -0000

It's good to see this work progressing. For the sake of clarity and
transparency, .bank and .insurance are listed in Appendix B, Part 2,
however fTLD Registry (the PSO) does not currently have permission from
ICANN to add a DMARC record to the DNS of these PSDs. The purpose for
kicking off this work in mid-2018 is to seek ICANN's approval to
participate in this experiment and going to them with an RFC# will assist
in advancing discussions with them.

Thanks very much.

Craig Schwartz
Managing Director
fTLD Registry Services - .BANK and .INSURANCE






On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:25 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication,
> Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Experimental DMARC Extension For Public Suffix
> Domains
>         Authors         : Scott Kitterman
>                           Tim Wicinski
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-12.txt
>         Pages           : 14
>         Date            : 2021-04-12
>
> Abstract:
>    Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance
>    (DMARC) permits a domain-controlling organization to express domain-
>    level policies and preferences for message validation, disposition,
>    and reporting, which a mail-receiving organization can use to improve
>    mail handling.
>
>    DMARC distinguishes the portion of a name that is a Public Suffix
>    Domain (PSD), below which organizational domain names are created.
>    The basic DMARC capability allows organizational domains to specify
>    policies that apply to their subdomains, but it does not give that
>    capability to PSDs.  This document describes an extension to DMARC to
>    fully enable DMARC functionality for PSDs.
>
>    Some implementations of DMARC consider a PSD to be ineligible for
>    DMARC enforcement.  This specification addresses that case.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-12
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-12
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-12
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>