[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization

Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org> Mon, 18 November 2019 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6821112098F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:49:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=aegee.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SWOQLqI7sBVk for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:49:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.aegee.org (mail.aegee.org [144.76.142.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D071B1200CD for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:49:44 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: mail.aegee.org/xAIFnfZk030400; auth=pass (LOGIN) smtp.auth=didopalauzov
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=aegee.org; s=k4096; t=1574092182; i=dkim+MSA-tls@aegee.org; bh=sfBCmKe9PX78rL0sc4hcVzwVV005wujkav/drsk7ZkQ=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=rvKi9nDpAC8QWyA7v/GesFWSyWC5tBoCB4idEK63H9nnh4NrKzxuWvX1ArCpzPWFW 5RVNFsCfRbT/rCrnMagVR0v4UE0tZMTMZEVuQc7XZI323NYgCggxyPpveECS8loa3p r7COO5yZKPRW10CC8Tw8pJHG3pHmulWq1l5q8gUh+bKvS9Mdcg9kiUmZBSN5uP1ctY sxrP99Qe3t+Y9NaQbNT8ffW3tB+PuXHm8qc8rPthBeD7ls4Yf8DiDNFjl+N1FP41eg tPeMU9WXImGiYqxm3afo8errMALUaWnG6HnoA07gK7Sl7I3qAkaeWf1qqyY688yrh7 gexc/+bvJJnWyo20ZGxnhFsE+NAEw4DcOAIi79qHQG3PqsNms1VGdYA7ZpVME2//bw +bdXG8nYBLvUwhEFmeXP1y6gwlej0UxyYM5xaX+3r2bXjad7tj9aF1Zj5KDp338LH/ hWVg4WZgLu1S79NQJO9qqVp6VEFyZGQFlWcC4cjnKEvdyybMPIFsjYBTl8Yp8aTu+b cyy+uWRnigxGu5weGy0F0WWAjhUppVWPJN/caH6s4Y4bZ4m3sSv6yJXjH0RymFL8kf PLPcyDp7ombhvVayNZ83hwv9bQYNJHYIlDaPvYjCqIFrLQPW+cXyx88Bm0eSEEiR+c bm58R/aV5vvW2oLCbf3yvs9s=
Authentication-Results: mail.aegee.org/xAIFnfZk030400; dkim=none
Received: from Tylan (87-118-146-153.ip.btc-net.bg [87.118.146.153]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.aegee.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xAIFnfZk030400 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:49:42 GMT
Message-ID: <0c529630b489d0852fd3fba0e8cdf0b68c6929e2.camel@aegee.org>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=94=D0=B8=D0=BB=D1=8F=D0=BD_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2?= <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
To: Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:49:41 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAD2i3WMcWf3KP6mpBeaniVHsv9fmWh+yYWr7T5EV3a_aecKgjA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD2i3WMcWf3KP6mpBeaniVHsv9fmWh+yYWr7T5EV3a_aecKgjA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.35.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.4 at mail.aegee.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/tEpuzwbRt__HHlVUXo41fHq5XoU>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:49:46 -0000

Hello,

who is going to work on DMARCbis document and is it realistic to finish it with a year?

Regards
  Дилян


On Thu, 2019-05-09 at 14:23 -0700, Seth Blank wrote:
> With the group officially in Phase III of the DMARC WG charter, our work is now to explicitly review and refine the DMARC specification, with the goal of generating a standards track document.
> 
> The draft-ietf-dmarc-psd experiment is part of this process, as is the conversation about defining proper ARC reporting XML for DMARC reports.
> 
> This email is an explicit CALL FOR ISSUES AND NITS about the DMARC spec which you believe should be officially discussed as part of the DMARCbis process. Please start a separate thread for each item you have. I'll make sure all are properly in the issue tracker and get addressed.
> 
> Please send in your items no later than *Friday, May 24th*. After this point, we'll be focusing on progressing the DMARCbis process, not gathering new issues.
> 
> Below are a list of nits already in the datatracker. I'll be kicking off threads for several other issues I'm aware of shortly.
> 
> Thanks everyone!
> 
> Seth, as Secretary
> 
> Active issues for DMARCbis in the data tracker:
> - SPF 4408 vs 7208: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/1
> - Flow of operations text: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/2
> - Two tiny nits in 6.6.2 and 6.6.3: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/2
> - Definition of "fo" parameter: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/4
> - Definition of "pct" parameter: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/5
> - Fuzzy normative language around filenames: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/6
> - ABNF for dmarc-record is slightly wrong: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/7
> - Perverse incentives to use p!=none & pct=0: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/22
> - objection to maintaining registry for all participating public suffixes: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/24
> - Link to "URI" reference broken in several sections: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/25
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc