Re: [dmarc-ietf] A tweak to draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sat, 29 February 2020 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A42E3A1192 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:19:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dmXX58ug5l-7 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:19:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 742F33A1168 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:19:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com with SMTP id p6so4088463vsj.11 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:19:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=S7av2pQP07lSCMp3v4qI/IlmjVPkJnMwmpxoU1S+zKs=; b=u+c15yi86Oby2+K9JwdHOJv1/12LjMd/4dVBOt8wKar/dCrshIJjXIp95+VGP2m0eG XMFbW0W2o6VbUtEBdJndjSxatXLP1SEfAy8hlGjVlizmbPXheCTrNK+6fJQEhn49ijPh 5nwux8tuIhrx86YQe480M/PyEWzvYN78GtIW7O97GKJgHAJQkXjs96MqtuS/8sHtftZi eOg5qhvVTtOBnkmHwmIpVendBAVqVZG4p3y9L4ch+wG4/DwB7Ye99m1lVDFGmyI7zuVw YcWXxFBegOZtkXWSQ6WfkGmWWCOjtjkkl36OBONYShDYjNCjGTgYyKRJ13QvXIndhxMB Wu5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=S7av2pQP07lSCMp3v4qI/IlmjVPkJnMwmpxoU1S+zKs=; b=rs1GNmgbJ3JSfKCwMROPOhtmgjvC1/r/GFZiz54Bj+anLxgYqQgv8i+rWIyPcfoGtM 2oVxZqypUP+Y0UzETqbH4zBLxaQ0v1NSNyz92urXrRMBgWl9lFHRrPMaxiP8pTj8SjNG tN1p8YNODmK8jT7MkhSGz7JjOqO8oe48UJQOZ9v8Fxu8RFAz0aJ4FgUlkZS5giIeRFT/ r9s8B3xRQEeXMUbACGoWkEW0C88oR6GlKW2391ZeZooB9IZQsI6i/qfDUC24GkSIzMcC P1KrQCWuot4GGrCp2MW4nh1ZZvvmLfzykvbXw4q5yI/PRyTTxS5h6FBTPitOkgOQyCzH 2ZMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3y3AcITp66TGLI5jFy+5sPamH0JpRImoeQISNlEYRXfvoThfwl Ymk5LIHaVNOgDQggT3fRV9DwztlTh4D+b9Tsx48=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vucHdg8AdVIwcuQ7ZyyHisP9MCTRmbWBU6CoyVIaIhulTYsMj4nObQnSa+DhtoVkcd+d5RdWPv990H06Aim+iQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:376:: with SMTP id f22mr5573893vsa.175.1583003980605; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:19:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwaU4-74Lq5vYTBMhkj60i+zAbY6JQdOdTVyUoY=pd+QvA@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+Hajp=hX9=8VVJLOJVZ82gLQmOaOJ7BAOhuXtzGi77ogw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+Hajp=hX9=8VVJLOJVZ82gLQmOaOJ7BAOhuXtzGi77ogw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 11:19:27 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwae955bAGNBYmPjTD+U0tJcniyXZa2CZ_2G47C6Pj+k5A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f130d9059fbbd510"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/tZzzJ9_2-pEjF44sBRwkAR4vtl0>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] A tweak to draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 19:19:45 -0000

I'm ambivalent at this stage about whether this makes it into the PSD
document, but please someone do add it to the queue for DMARCbis.

On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 11:16 AM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> If we're going down the road of definitions, RFC8499 defines what a
> "Public suffix" is
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8499#page-28
>
> Which could assist in the Public Suffix Domain definition here.
> If this makes sense, I can offer some suggested text
>
> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 2:06 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> It occurs to me on review that this draft refers to Organizational
>> Domain, and probably some other terms, without defining them or expressly
>> importing them from RFC7489.  In particular Section 2.3 refers to the OD
>> with no prior definition.
>>
>> Maybe: Insert a new Section 2.2 (pushing others down) that explicitly
>> refers to RFC7489 Section 3.2, or more generally points out that this
>> document uses terms defined in that one.
>>
>> This doesn't have to be done now; Scott, you can wait until IETF LC has
>> ended if you like, unless you have other nits pending to be posted.
>>
>> -MSK
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmarc mailing list
>> dmarc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>
>