Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Sat, 13 July 2019 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F381200F3 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 12:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.091
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.091 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=vJ3cofgm; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=bvAKTkM+
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id znFUAJhX1qcv for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 12:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA42512003E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 12:35:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C76FF80689 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 15:34:52 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1563046492; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=3Dmv1rKWmXd8bl/a+NshL0B1tRsRY3WRR3wZeRIZaJc=; b=vJ3cofgmapWySZnlYvO3ZftFM7gsVcmJVVkAEvZ8770fWUU0QeaV9/6V XT1hErVvKqkGF8rIq5XZmBQdCVTcDA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1563046492; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=3Dmv1rKWmXd8bl/a+NshL0B1tRsRY3WRR3wZeRIZaJc=; b=bvAKTkM+iuOfMyy6Z5umfAVA1V51egzNbupIF2LsZZJlch83CiRgLti6 BqpsMpOs1CCaZhgcTwb0hNwkFw91rQzLTfDJflSqJjFohJTnlFhGQNqIVX EnvNmnaFnsJ3/8IZOY5d2FHHGBWkKVfRe0zQtOPNexfAb9zzVgD1QoUZ4y /WeUYssCqjkr8o5s73XEHNLVUSKqEvK1T4EZnhIMje4wmyVgY2K+tyGIZ7 4owcQ9VJV1vN72AnnepF8GvG2LFWK+biJldKQRYchUuCimEunCQCJoSiCP CW1Ud9ZMED79iKozGibpFTyt5m/H6XCHBimeys6Wivz5IDiU7bbB+Q==
Received: from l5580.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44D5AF80607 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 15:34:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 15:34:51 -0400
Message-ID: <4789054.Ip9ilXyiH0@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <1958020.28HeBAo97T@l5580>
References: <CAL0qLwbbz_UhBLsURg=eXhRBC2g9OghiN==T9Uq9pFuLtd=b7w@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1rCF1C1rK9PpbEiDmP+85FvgB_aSuvieGL=hRcrFGXNBg@mail.gmail.com> <1958020.28HeBAo97T@l5580>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="nextPart2182572.SKLRh5PmXv"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/tnQcJjmhHA6nkHHr27HXLsUrfTo>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 19:35:26 -0000

On Friday, July 12, 2019 2:28:39 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, July 12, 2019 1:54:57 PM EDT Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:50 AM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>;
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:21:14 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote:
> > > > 3. If an np= tag is needed to allow PSD functioning for only NXDOMAINs
> > > 
> > > The limited feedback during WGLC has been favorable to this.
> > > 
> > > This will require a rather larger change to the document than the other
> > > issues, but they are manageable and I believe I have most of the
> > > relevant
> > > text
> > > from earlier revisions.
> > > 
> > > I think we should include this.
> > 
> > I am much more concerned with adding another tag that can only be used in
> > a
> > PSD-DMARC record. I would be much more open to make a "normative" change
> > to
> > the DMARC tag list (RFC 7489 section 11.4) to define np for any DMARC
> > record, than to make this a special case for PSD-DMARC records.
> 
> I agree.  My intent is to add the tag to be used experimentally for any
> DMARC record.  Part of the experiment is to see if it's useful beyond PSD.

Attached is my proposed text to add the np tag.  Based on the discussion to 
date, I assume I'll be asked to add something like this after last call is 
complete, so please let me know how to make it better.

Scott K