IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 29 January 2021 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE773A0E18 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:52:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hlFe7wJCtrfa for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:52:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 745383A1042 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:52:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id k8so8814152otr.8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:52:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=My6EqM74goF+wLYeJMfR2IlDWvpDpl6p0pYGc4kacis=; b=jC/SUfScGTWaXDL1Y+4mq/fCX2lQAy+W4CJPyybHaNE+cmeMPwx0YbkJoPhaEP08Fk 9OYovColDBFbsps2AH5ZpY7Vuh/FlrMdtWQHy025+MShFB6pXuShn6S/ReH/YCzZdaaw 2WNEdNw+ihizwTob2rHnqumjjM3q47V1XfllEoowSajUeJ7CgIqQX6AQFWW/Ay+qEBKp ShuRnnATA+EOf9DuM61LwFqb3pYbZ2JxVmjqhL/Va/DHJGOOiSM3tx2X6JgbSbgtLfMQ U9CRGCm/g3p679rijsprdYdEp5HbRt87KHp56Wv6KTxOyq4RqyWveRehLlB/2EtACfAl 2BmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=My6EqM74goF+wLYeJMfR2IlDWvpDpl6p0pYGc4kacis=; b=WnJO7WY9HD3fFJXSXSzEUyImV4gDRZRRJWcbLtrO3J2TucQIf528yfqYHfPXf0wkGk 2IF/9UNVz5ydMzft5I8Q+YAyzCRGv1TfxT5ZOUqmivS3LBo9Ag5z/tqNqxxHnZ7AwNqX JCq3MJs974unr0QCwLiK0Baq7gXLhzpL3G0d28m+0NPORmYS+sIw8nfGclNNY6uQkugL 4FU1GyPNe9DIz60mq/lxQHY13zxmOfPpGuC3ImoZQPjmr/JWkmMGFBoaA69smW1Wylus Xvc+8jb3gwlgXgmN5M/CFm1sIgL8nj/jWAfDz2hUw6dNdB5aj68LbqzrNe6641ikLFJZ H5ZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+ndN8MbEiG+8l98n/eq9ayFKsiwO9DiZ2kIReFTz+U4F7ijVP Bnwx7tdHU4rgNl15NFi2AyVQ1EYrtW0EffH7VKrSn6GNMkU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJUkkuwHBBbHXxgAFR37JsPEeuAvIORtC9m7g7mE8gylSBSefbrp8n2bEjQ2gc0aWn6zjYdNxn/4gO25w17FM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:208d:: with SMTP id y13mr3203740otq.288.1611931962784; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:52:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+Fb93SkiAnL4cuCfxC5Wi1ERLeKhguWqAp3j8YEa6JBSA@mail.gmail.com> <87ima4wu3s.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <CAL0qLwbiOrgsEjZU_V6W8e42SRNoUh7CzyngRMR5RLeQpzrxaQ@mail.gmail.com> <44eec884-a3c7-f0e3-4545-1032369ad3fd@tana.it> <CAL0qLwavpE9r6+O+Dm5EyDYzP9_pTpTbbjMzL1mPTyJky5CKmA@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+Hn5G_WSHjrD3gLL5HwZxDGoV_wxgAuiPc_sutQ4OYhNg@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1oxkNUB_E8Q5do5xCruxXGvqY2461u0ZMZ1J5BFE8dTqg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwb9RUBTTfwNNLn+do1iNE-A1Ke-NcW+SidqhJqd3BdPig@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1qLPkVQFDxUKXsgzqoK4Qcd7Rn5Q4bOed_4WkVv-FuB7w@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+FejAGbv8TLrGXpV_Crgi1KErKK_1-6=2jzZh+QbguK6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYrXEaOVphUjAB1guQO=s+ppabP1q4Ne16rqF=e6JsqLw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYrXEaOVphUjAB1guQO=s+ppabP1q4Ne16rqF=e6JsqLw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:52:31 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+Fx-jVGGgzf6-R6n1OzpwQR3akFJeVNqmq=XN_X=1B-Cg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000b40d205ba0b28e1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/uW-8CjfCBnNzO5Xofk_akOh2PiQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:52:46 -0000

I suggest adding it to this paragraph:

   This document specifies experimental updates to the DMARC and PSL
   algorithm cited above, in an attempt to mitigate this abuse.



On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 1:44 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 5:01 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Since this is an experiment, Appendix A discusses the updates that
>> happen.  we don't actually say explicitly "if the experiment is a success,
>> the following changes will be made" and perhaps I should add some wording
>> like that.
>>
>
> Something like this, perhaps?
>
> "A standards track update to [RFC7489] will take into account the results
> of this experiment."
>
> ... somewhere in Section 1.
>
> -MSK
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email