Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #80 - DMARCbis Should Have Clear and Concise Definition of DMARC

[Todd Herr <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 7:25 AM Alessandro Vesely <[e-mail]> wrote:

> On Thu 31/Dec/2020 20:24:59 +0100 John Levine wrote:
> > In article <CAHej_8kkuQR3_LiV_O5Z-EPvVeZrdTPvCiK7rOmWKxQKsp=
> [e-mail]> you write:
> >>
> >>Dave Crocker submitted some suggestions on-list, and I noodled a bit with
> >>the text myself, and submit the following for your collective
> consideration:
> >
> > I have a few minor editorial tweaks to suggest but they can wait.  I
> think
> > we should use this text.
>
>
> +1, I see it's not yet on github.  Please go ahead, possibly posting a
> .txt as
> well, so we can run IETF's diff tool.
>
>
>
Updated version, including .txt but without your suggested minor tweaks, is
posted here - https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis

Note that lack of inclusion of your minor tweaks obviously does not mean
that they've been rejected; I just wanted to complete the process of
checking in a new branch, doing a pull request, and merging the new branch
with main.

-- 

*Todd Herr* | Sr. Technical Program Manager
*e:* [e-mail]
*p:* 703.220.4153


This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.