Re: [dmarc-ietf] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-07

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 07 March 2020 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AAE63A1A01 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 12:42:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=uFvbxj9V; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=mRNs0JU3
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QPpsiUiP8_Zg for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 12:42:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBB0B3A0929 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 12:42:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 91580 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2020 20:42:48 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; =?utf-8?q?h=3Ddate?= =?utf-8?q?=3Amessage-id=3Afrom=3Ato=3Acc=3Asubject=3Ain-reply-to=3Amime-ver?= =?utf-8?q?sion=3Acontent-type=3Acontent-transfer-encoding=3B?= =?utf-8?q?s=3D165ba=2E5e640748=2Ek2003=3B_bh=3DzIw9NxEexN6dhPY/IgY81y7J6/sP?= =?utf-8?q?AbpbYLU20+QE7ok=3D=3B_b=3DuFvbxj9VCJS7MMgNmxX1e5An9pBgxa+ZdkmYhex?= =?utf-8?q?Wcipgf6VAaIRrIQ5zLbhIQZMM2nAO1Y/wDXdxYLmk1OvEv2rkpjQe5RtVbYWBwhHh?= =?utf-8?q?IXhY3Ei9MFiaHzrLlN6b9w/KRusAR+0ZER6ARPe3mbDymc+fxNr6Ze+Tdv/OjEb7s?= =?utf-8?q?heYfSoXRT2GK7V3q4C4WPP0c198cgOgMcKJCM4qlb/hKcGOpETaHQ4yx+6T89L7wQ?= =?utf-8?q?keC9brt2ZaluH6YRO+YRas?=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; =?utf-8?q?h=3Ddate?= =?utf-8?q?=3Amessage-id=3Afrom=3Ato=3Acc=3Asubject=3Ain-reply-to=3Amime-ver?= =?utf-8?q?sion=3Acontent-type=3Acontent-transfer-encoding=3B?= =?utf-8?q?s=3D165ba=2E5e640748=2Ek2003=3B_bh=3DzIw9NxEexN6dhPY/IgY81y7J6/sP?= =?utf-8?q?AbpbYLU20+QE7ok=3D=3B_b=3DmRNs0JU3LGsy6pwuFgcaF8K8iKi8UYqxk4YX9mb?= =?utf-8?q?PKfGnFzqgaiJ/kJ47gguclXrE4MrHqgdmmofKIVVnr/abKkw38X/i0b30qWnAcxHE?= =?utf-8?q?qatCi8oWC2/sBRyK40Ch3xwjBy/SsfccWARWB5fgzam5O5/k1MCZ9fILdROB+l+UG?= =?utf-8?q?XrpbRYn3AfiXWUhEQyK1xjVPAMM0797gkc8/Tr6tdSZ9lw7fcFt9y6KnJxf3vdTzg?= =?utf-8?q?Jvkh3Z8vJ0UcCxX/I3mn/C?=
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 07 Mar 2020 20:42:47 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id D40AA1593AC6; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 15:42:47 -0500 (EST)
Date: 7 Mar 2020 15:42:47 -0500
Message-Id: <20200307204247.D40AA1593AC6@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: kboth@drkurt.com
In-Reply-To: <CABuGu1rheCAfHShcRWrehpru2kJpCToEqwai1g_njBb5aJFmtw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/uccAsm6BUgmpNQqnrZwp-g8ZaE0>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-07
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 20:42:52 -0000

In article <CABuGu1rheCAfHShcRWrehpru2kJpCToEqwai1g_njBb5aJFmtw@mail.gmail.com> you write:
> Since information about existing implementations gets removed as a doc
>passes through the editor's hands, I'm not sure why it would matter to
>update a section that will be removed.

Only if we ask them to.  I don't see anything in the draft asking them to take
that section out.  I'd prefer to leave them in, since hints about where to find
working code are always helpful even if out of date.

R's,
John