[dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiine

Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org> Fri, 02 August 2019 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C99120128 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=aegee.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fuIEqdXSXwvz for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.aegee.org (mail.aegee.org [144.76.142.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0777712004F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: mail.aegee.org/x72M2FTT012626; auth=pass (LOGIN) smtp.auth=didopalauzov
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=aegee.org; s=k4096; t=1564783336; i=dkim+MSA-tls@aegee.org; r=y; bh=m/QFd7Iq+doPOYr19Z78rZHu0ER/pPj0g2JRVztYVnI=; h=Subject:From:To:Date; b=C9YUeIdTXM+JgXRpSmHQ3Gm0+alCAp76hHqtroKsIdFplFoU1d3ltKu8g1XOj44G8 lIjSO7tIow76jEiL/byyMJI1ESLqUrfUbEv2CKoLYe0rv375HeKui75dGDgmnb3OxQ CCeLoSAi++vpDaX3ySBbh6Jgu8KIaF8+9vgg1IYn1pHhvlUvkba7Iqw6W8YGFnX54O 1QusQRJLLxZfbeHh6etrYJQcO0LdoHaUPGj8+fRYajMQjXENwEpIKQago235yd2UJu 8v7Jd6mO2GPCApRxmeqXi2mlJfjSo+6RclO3zUJbtmIKatTUvQvgDqQ7Srg/X13Ycw IK5VYoBFaKXuLUKCgkHIgwm56OlUjukH37BgO1gM32OTR4FHo6cgd6rF3wbjKchRoC t2NTq1BAPArzWhbTB6a8up0iHe1NbAmRwVoLgJL3qIiPiCfQHsZB9aNvRajXvE3Z+n zTEMGwyCTyvu/hqkiPO01+xQE0OPpN4RTHjFHZYGpxDgPhLTCNrSTirvTdLpI663Ph penRhuIFuPPZWx0zzTUhv7Lo/exDKBbsHCo2PGshWYlwtYQ6Jg6IK2hUJ9v8WuwbbZ r+D5ZkKXZpRi6cZWqfHA/t7wy7q5SyK1g+z9PechajWAJla0n/Wmg76j/cA+nZOUv6 mo6fltetW+vb1VEn2FHjsHNc=
Authentication-Results: mail.aegee.org/x72M2FTT012626; dkim=none
Received: from Tylan (87-118-146-153.ip.btc-net.bg [87.118.146.153]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.aegee.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x72M2FTT012626 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 22:02:16 GMT
Message-ID: <c586258d8480a4ff71d3c14bef10cf3aec66ab7d.camel@aegee.org>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=94=D0=B8=D0=BB=D1=8F=D0=BD_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2?= <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
To: dmarc <dmarc@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 22:02:15 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.33.90
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.2 at mail.aegee.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/vAhbWixaw5XFLZ6ItoggGskgxNM>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiine
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 22:02:21 -0000

Current wording for p=quarantine
      quarantine:  The Domain Owner wishes to have email that fails the
         DMARC mechanism check be treated by Mail Receivers as
         suspicious.  Depending on the capabilities of the Mail
         Receiver, this can mean "place into spam folder", "scrutinize
         with additional intensity", and/or "flag as suspicious".

Amendment to the wording for p=quarantine:

… or reject at SMTP level.  The Domain Owner wishes in addition, that the sender of messages failing DMARC are notified
about the suspicious handling with an appropriate rejection message.  Senders not willing to be notified that their
message is suspicious, shall use the NOTIFY=NEVER service extension.

In the past, Domain Owner could express as wish either to reject or to quarantine.  Considering that from the options:
only reject; only qurantine; and quarantine, while notifying the sender about the suspicious handling of the message;
nobody will choose only to quarantine, the interpretation of what the Domain Owner wishes by publishing quarantine was
changed to include the rejection component.