Re: [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 10 April 2020 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FBE3A089C for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 09:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.852
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=eSjv5ISh; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=rtrxxqOq
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BLSivQt5zRDf for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 09:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 069223A087B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 09:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 77247 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2020 16:34:10 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=12dbd.5e90a002.k2004; bh=90DVv1qWcPHsPmW00IiyjKskFNPXKxRpkLirJQ2xm8c=; b=eSjv5IShTyfh0kSgyaZIjejSt98npbLrdHoTCyO0sA8V+VacGDpn9REQKbcmJXRJmvZg0wttquSk8vZ7bKnP7wwqvrO59LY+cJgROzeVnwzjp7MLHZwk+fYJ8cE1XcFoKHsn8EPZ1ESVmKztmLPNgMHmfpFBMAkAOSdidhB5QHr6aTqWl5Xy5o25xAPD71XTmSITE8pSeSFUer7DlQ4sfPwkEjBkpQmnBBosAohkr14fFAbO0syR7fI9wAj62FMc
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=12dbd.5e90a002.k2004; bh=90DVv1qWcPHsPmW00IiyjKskFNPXKxRpkLirJQ2xm8c=; b=rtrxxqOqhMF47LAZYSG2+/E2hhLz4xVeO/sdtbjNQ9Zq7GyPuYtDK/nfnklmfwSoM7EhAipeKMN+PZuAsJh9mh/VaMyIQedvmhU8GYK8PN1ziP9qcqgz93ws+rTRwCKAPrUQjfOoKA5Z7lbMvwkf4s9bTAco0GN6SUb8cK94GNjhu2+g9N6BaigAZclWPJxomMQOsCKwHnnG11FO4HLYU0hWWy3rdpHo4iyvqWIIOe+Ezz995yF9eqLw7osnY46d
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 10 Apr 2020 16:34:09 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id B0AE81769C14; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:34:09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 10 Apr 2020 12:34:09 -0400
Message-Id: <20200410163409.B0AE81769C14@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: tjw.ietf@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+EXPAMWXNQrgkbx=skKOHN-j+QicCser1rTg1anwPwonw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/vNN7V5hk7cbp6PeRYesu-fNKn3o>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 16:34:12 -0000

In article <CADyWQ+EXPAMWXNQrgkbx=skKOHN-j+QicCser1rTg1anwPwonw@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Agree with John/Scott/Kurt on keeping this in 7489 and trying to weasel
>word around it for now.

So how about renaming it Policy Super Domain (PSD)?

R's,
John