Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops are a problem

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Tue, 02 February 2021 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CCC3A15E6 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:16:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7i6H6740WZnw for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:16:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32e.google.com (mail-ot1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D26133A15E9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:16:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id h14so18215601otr.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:16:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=EDER7haobZ21WvpBJwQpFrL+Xyg+q07hsPRkrDmrogc=; b=P0ET/qwOBH49Q+GUMZVfvPTNzECsjJ/cJMwl2hOY2S2jLehsGVOXQZUBBBQcX2Aayz Y/WvkN6sKbilzlNPIHRlr247yLtvCzRTpZ4WBoCvGYfqezJxjLvwB7HB7mAAfjSqBroH bD8nDYebCiO7WnY7eEmklKBVxIw6om3Rzh70CEhzG0h/4R9vzSVcxDBELwWsM66dC5i8 rR3taJlZsarKLArwtPC3uIkFcQr0+SO2BgvI973aIoqIBxYLGWQ0vY/TkwGrDtuJmWxw NCILKtWVD3wkEVKWLE++rsopvxj01AWI/B9gppFcc/hTIlhU0wzh+/FDBVKyX3/5Env2 COow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=EDER7haobZ21WvpBJwQpFrL+Xyg+q07hsPRkrDmrogc=; b=UowWjAeGMpqioAIarrLO8q2Bqw9tEb+n324PNlm7CHjN03IiwCI31bZ+35ch7DFzu5 Fo6LmAubxQHDtalbT16mUxBwRFINxVJJlq/PXSJ9fn226fn2bVBqpE3CX7r7iboa7gL9 8eJk6FvwwZUm7xTo7KmVvE46c/AzZUnlRyD1AWRFj761fq3YYQkaEp2R2/mhxEFow8IK 7lVgc9UcrP1C6/ptAQZsA5Ag3XY3TX+xH3UME0pRSikqhP2XYEadZzFdkprsrs30C/A2 CBc0Ta1TXHcdS+1Hu+GOaLbbMLt0fqhPoliWV4myMfuz60UVBIRrfVQZRKXDRPRsZivt Zm7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531dEHCdyw6AG0QKvHiYN3BKFYGhAGcRmkISqeBvtW3YtS2cqCQ3 p1aRuR5JCHPTh+J+sqc8pbXfAj5MnxJjkg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzOxUhexKknTynyXCXd+oILjo9NAVHS1icabQTX03qCcc0Ohmhz686Mkqx9Mqy0QU4oPvDj5A==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1318:: with SMTP id p24mr13269041otq.302.1612225011087; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:16:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.226.162.63]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y10sm4526357ooy.11.2021.02.01.16.16.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:16:50 -0800 (PST)
To: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20210201232105.1931D6D20971@ary.qy> <41163cd5-be81-6fd7-07dd-7a474874429e@gmail.com> <044c4a55-facb-9053-1ae9-0b8d87c7ca3a@mtcc.com> <CAJ4XoYeHxhZyAsMBJfjDn7XFSeFt39agjoFQRBTbMZ0zdvaLyg@mail.gmail.com> <38f5c417-3c7d-72c9-2590-391c07226164@mtcc.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <16430b47-2496-b461-e292-ea6a7d945e71@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:16:48 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <38f5c417-3c7d-72c9-2590-391c07226164@mtcc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/vQh_chF2U7Q6YdW3Xae9Ck7gfss>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops are a problem
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 00:16:53 -0000

On 2/1/2021 4:12 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
> So we're supposed to ignore security considerations because... some 
> companies are a mess?


we're supposed to balance purported security considerations with 
pragmatic, real-world operational limits.

cost/benefit.  not an unusual concept.

d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@gmail.com
408.329.0791

Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@redcross.org