Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 20 November 2018 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994DF130EA7 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:09:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bkKzo-KNXJ3E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:09:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-f50.google.com (mail-ed1-f50.google.com [209.85.208.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D16EB130EEA for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:09:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-f50.google.com with SMTP id r27so3296800eda.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:09:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=mTeZbZGmK0PJxuugBsFrFn+uu9JgKVTBlqD8zkvm85I=; b=DbsQ+eZItmvdJHRHSTjXpGxvdawimnQveVsUvEwd5Xgy4yw6hrOL1pNAZ0sE9QHZY9 8OzFJfvDRZm9gWDAiS8Ckm8cpMbk8/DJVj6pjtQgRTLXZ9Z4uDa/NrQUu4499Cog89Lw 1QbMX6OhiRTLGnC4Q0r2pDjgZiqNlUQDvpCmmY2wMkFJku59tgFscunwXptnHrWmTycl +dqrNcxAU95D0g5/+EPTWhYqqD7PwjnCDtOYW3G19FFV5EhUDJopmY4WiRNyooBX821O i3FPgwCsYA823nUxF3wWzzuThNgrhvJ/pVWmNeWkUsNsuz70l9pYfqXMkIeJIZ19DYPC LxZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWa7aThS/CLpP3BcMbeUl+qLmZnfUHMxAtCqRuctMb6ib58fsY9E phgJM6WqfUS+YfVBviDkpWIj0UtN4wEmSr29O8D5GyoG
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VkV/AOHphM9nR7XqZEkvlczLb0J1DtRuBa5DOZvF9uShw4oAKFgcGp3/neQMB+OH2xVxSElVbqn3bOAUDQZr8=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:ce0f:: with SMTP id y15mr3110830edi.207.1542751750798; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:09:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABuGu1o4E-Svt9N++RaFvO4SATt3Wh1w7gZb1OdBSVRCm7Odmg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCQmV5agORght0XWr27kDD+OkaEZcKcaDtE8wLG0Yi-YA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCQmV5agORght0XWr27kDD+OkaEZcKcaDtE8wLG0Yi-YA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:08:59 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVDqHcg=BJ2x4CSkSQjK_Wq3fvA-4yjjC_GJMNvjk-T_9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/xJwg5YHru0q1-MqrTPe-O576FdU>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:09:20 -0000

> > I'd like to recommend that we (DMARC-WG) accept https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kitterman-dmarc-psd-00
> > into our work queue. It aligns with our charter already.
>
> I've seen three agreements and no objections, so here's an official
> call for objections.  If there are none by 16 November, we will create
> draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-00 as a new working group item.

Lots of discussion, and no objections to working on this and starting
with Scott's draft.  So, Scott, please post draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-00,
and let's continue the discussion.

Barry