Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses
"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Wed, 24 March 2021 22:34 UTC
Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1EA3A0ED1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cSWZ_EhyahBL for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EC793A0ECE for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id j26so23208587iog.13 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6nq2WmIPVPBiI/L7U+ws2jK+V6+QhgyZLfVJTn4b8Ls=; b=BenNmgrxQyEH4N7KTs3H5nistA/Cr4hPlB4gqpPXgCJ6lMmOE5+QTNhPk5zSEYr399 wDEgzyp3SS9ebFeHW4KQQonwi459ZDaVma2Np5UOzscPePATaLUnPGO3+Tbz/7KCXBja 78adCvWS/DPFUd9rv0dHd/cbOsezqvjx5nMsM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6nq2WmIPVPBiI/L7U+ws2jK+V6+QhgyZLfVJTn4b8Ls=; b=gRTyU6kmRyzoEMHucgPdeXP1GA7BQ0OgSGq9OCSDipjqN544m8QHaexHrxb2HTeqtB VeDklQV9V1q0gqAnOkxrcB87TPfeSvY1DfA280G1pD0hVWjH57oGdKk26+7h7IuTl/T9 m44yKgEgXK/6t2YPVAdMd+2E1RYr9GlrInU4tjKC6OBdgLVODFo9c/6yNN2czTVW+Eo3 vUzAixcrdwfVaS/9Of2B2K4RPCmbvco9GYRq+GEd8J21oKC6r6iDb9LDR2Ctqb27wKZn A+xkfsgGgRffccZEQ8xCpT9JDyYjcL3Dn8rxx7TufOcsnqdRdxIuHazzcNhMo4lsmzJ4 khVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530IVkVKroq+1O2f0T6GlfTi4igpsXTvIjopcyiWIV96dQ3VXPpd aH7hmL5FutYALGQ7fAccR4zFRyYt2B9vb5HLfchMEA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvWKx2BOO/2wKXb8NoHThh6hpcznxyB7V1sxdYuMkIpqJ8z2hPNV0jjGP5PjLmUdka9XhrZH0mweZSgoOd02k=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7302:: with SMTP id e2mr4229418ioh.106.1616625268876; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5e8acd0c67c9491e832c218b16530094@possumdelight.com>
In-Reply-To: <5e8acd0c67c9491e832c218b16530094@possumdelight.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:34:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1op9GTiqgqt=K=J3HJQP75BvmbsjAkiYR1Awa4gpoiOHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Charles Gregory <Charles@possumdelight.com>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>, "gelliot@mimecast.com" <gelliot@mimecast.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e2f07e05be4fe62b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/xUjkeZFCc7fG8GsVzR4I_bXH7eE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:34:35 -0000
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 3:25 PM Charles Gregory <Charles@possumdelight.com> wrote: > > Has anyone considered an option to add "affiliated domains" to a DNS > entry? That way at least you could specify legitimate alternate/authorized > domains that could still pass DMARC. > Yes, but no technically and operationally sound solution has yet achieved consensus. --Kurt
- [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Charles Gregory
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Ken O'Driscoll
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Charles Gregory
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Gren Elliot
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Gren Elliot
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Charles Gregory
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Charles Gregory
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Charles Gregory
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Charles Gregory
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Jim Fenton
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Sender vs From Addresses Murray S. Kucherawy