From nobody Tue Nov 30 09:00:07 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF59D3A1421 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:00:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -17.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DIO0AdIhtrhk for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:59:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-il1-x12e.google.com (mail-il1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 777A43A1449 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:59:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id z8so11861753ilu.7 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:59:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ynRkKEdX1zWqBoH/i7bSnjamL+FdXzS8JgTBE3G3WLQ=; b=Kni1QpqJjI2miLwSyHF/0dqfBfchY/Sk8aWehkqoZ6eVbNtzeKMDgzFwInL2uq2Vin GCASaQg92qz4S8RVi5HgN7wZ45bvoEtlPKn5pWAXyEDlAqnesFw/fVT7Kvsi7Us3UVzY 5LsXCG+qJPwMSVH0Flqk78mx34wIOtTBTWYJtuUki2BDXXhmtgLnbPFeDwflP28/9fX/ VpEcFB3a4lB3gHkdNw5ThXUiT+0cuc+cQ3BIkt3hEtrG/FimXVNkF+vl5ahphIWx8phn Fpwg7EvRXwMYBkbsihEO0J499uKj1ivTNfbIQ9Lx+PUHUS29kITSnfTx+vaZiwGf1OUP uO5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ynRkKEdX1zWqBoH/i7bSnjamL+FdXzS8JgTBE3G3WLQ=; b=ytRjF/HIJE6YthNLWoo+EJnS5IrU72054G90bx83b2K5gKK4DJK01qA1npLFpfaSNA OQUkQoSlrR20vzd/nO5rz7/HNYEbCiOar+X/lnCBPuwFTSiAIUJS0jFGzpxM3uDosSfC fYVfoxNIis8y0d8pBpJjgT3QhAvvdcEmrhFGNAk9F6GL5QnPa2OXQW1Ue+Twc37ZNkgt UiW+pa06sQiRvrgLZ2PmyPrDRA2BQ9nsfS8P/GYj0YAe547/GhnxGaaQugRWfQixh0HO BozCwFBwEvlDep7yWfvmiIVjO1cxsoGfmqjU3vqDx0UF9Bh+JL6zmhdkL62lXDbZyFp9 f+Qg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+W87ijgtgw7Y7iSLzSTIgE540BFYdXYxByjAeWaJd/YdfGX92 0DXXgaaOmk4IXifksQAWexDS5xxeo+ksFlUX9DuWDQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyOz2ii0eDsGMuB4ZZCrFdC3RtOhk0+gCrHEPQ+i4htWABvluIkSVOw9aWo1/+u7R5BCAZsyISz0AhRqntD+a8= X-Received: by 2002:a92:cf52:: with SMTP id c18mr264566ilr.226.1638291595126; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:59:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211126042946.6F86F3091B76@ary.local> <01S6OJDEJX3O005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com> In-Reply-To: From: Wei Chuang Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:59:43 -0800 Message-ID: To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" Cc: IETF DMARC WG Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000914a4705d2047c6f" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reversing modifications from mailing lists X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 17:00:03 -0000 --000000000000914a4705d2047c6f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:29 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 3:31 PM Wei Chuang 40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> >> This approach and benefit was what I was thinking could be feasible as >> well. The cited draft-kucherawy-dkim-list-canon >> draft notes >> your contribution to the concept described there i.e. to perform hashing as >> a mime-tree (though that draft doesn't do content transport decoding). >> > > It does, in Section 3. > > -MSK > Got it. Sorry I missed that. -Wei --000000000000914a4705d2047c6f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:29 PM Murr= ay S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.= com> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 3:31 PM Wei Ch= uang <weihaw=3D40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

This approach and benefit was what = I was=C2=A0thinking could be feasible as well.=C2=A0 The cited=C2=A0draft-kucherawy-dkim-list-canon=C2=A0draft=C2=A0notes= your contribution to the concept described there i.e. to perform hashing a= s a mime-tree (though that draft doesn't do content transport decoding)= .=C2=A0=C2=A0

It does, in= Section 3.

-MSK

Got it.=C2=A0 Sorry I missed that.

-Wei=C2=A0
--000000000000914a4705d2047c6f--