IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items

Steven M Jones <smj@crash.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 01:00 UTC

Return-Path: <smj@crash.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AAC12D4E7 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 17:00:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=crash.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I9skrpCuHJEq for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 17:00:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from segv.crash.com (segv.crash.com [IPv6:2001:470:1:1e9::4415]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBCDE1286E7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 17:00:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.4.215] ([153.150.250.176]) (authenticated bits=0) by segv.crash.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/cci-colo-1.7) with ESMTPSA id wA810bNI021330 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 01:00:46 GMT (envelope-from smj@crash.com)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 segv.crash.com wA810bNI021330
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crash.com; s=201506-2k; t=1541638847; bh=rBaUsGyKwC1cQzGq1V37hkWb3xEZFg+MAXkWpC9vQ04=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=mShOb/hrmEnXsgncapkDa4dn0SXUXgUFqDZbBvzFM7krKMSJSkTDXGa+rUk8u/Enf 2wVDxoYN36tTd488jGVqRiq1VdRdZZB7RGgOxqn6TBb6U8MIIqKbL0sxIOs2MZBZ97 9Skt1mDkUOnhD46gZa8Jtm8AHpaQ+BNv/eh5XWMPcM8KYgdBk3jC0CbUSL4nhs+79q og/xCAEgmhlkMb9OTtN9+/HbaBfAA3CM1Xiop0OjZqpYt6l1sHr8wMh9gWczMmFzTX yAvevslNR2aXi1PyZfCb/r/IdbjBzM+DHT6QbzJjwS+Jy2dQHMPaUecbDav+8536BR BTevxCrROGFmw==
X-Authentication-Warning: segv.crash.com: Host [153.150.250.176] claimed to be [192.168.4.215]
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <CABuGu1o4E-Svt9N++RaFvO4SATt3Wh1w7gZb1OdBSVRCm7Odmg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCQmV5agORght0XWr27kDD+OkaEZcKcaDtE8wLG0Yi-YA@mail.gmail.com> <dee0fd86-40e3-e01d-6c70-2f467759be8b@tana.it> <93BFC1AD-9CC4-4CB4-89E1-A735AF5CD8E4@kitterman.com> <635dea71-2077-9a1a-e7a2-8594697e1068@tana.it> <AB35FEF5-74C9-400D-9A7F-543F9CAA215D@kitterman.com>
From: Steven M Jones <smj@crash.com>
Message-ID: <edba3ee3-ec8c-eac8-1b67-606bb340c521@crash.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:00:30 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AB35FEF5-74C9-400D-9A7F-543F9CAA215D@kitterman.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (segv.crash.com [72.52.75.15]); Thu, 08 Nov 2018 01:00:47 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/yMx5x6W8g0nQqlUhZ6eEW9tznf4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 01:00:49 -0000

On 11/07/2018 11:41 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I'd suggest we adopt the draft/work item and then try to figure it out.

+1. We should see where we can get with this topic.

--S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email