Re: [dmarc-ietf] Post-IESG Review edits to RFC7601bis

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 23 January 2019 05:10 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93A2130DFA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 21:10:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PBma41ji9QYw for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 21:10:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2432127AC2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 21:10:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id n18-v6so745967lji.7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 21:10:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2z9oIRY02uYztt2hUYIWT8GafFYrsOjjTCuP62ah328=; b=edCA3wKPAdIXYSkehyRpEvjZKSifkjjIUfMbt9fM7QhjlJz5HlkLYNCF0BuLiEspxp vR+fDKaK8UcmFieMyd+qQ2mfnhvRxUoApciCeGszee2wo7zHgCz3zKLezeuN/xPg0paz NM3Xftav6FNiGVYtjpakzT77omVnWQ7R5LpImhrGLjF4jN5UJIHgm8sn3ntYI6EHyWV4 ZTkWC83g2+Pzj9EXbfWemQCd+/hhPnUUhpCwOnF2lRU+yNPgxl5w59IOoHhKQz5aVZsg goKY03eTn7/nkMyJT2Bbw+TxlY2BczqHdFU04MYC8QooS7919Wl2gZbDBGhnK1gYR55N sITw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2z9oIRY02uYztt2hUYIWT8GafFYrsOjjTCuP62ah328=; b=tKWy4S8t/WLL8M4qhWBJgP6GISn+oO1ZtwL/3F5orOpksk8fjhSayMw+Ilx21SQRPw /T3EpLmOvFVkqjejG2w8DgLMbZmtYPnbUuVpXnq0kor7KD3AdAmLCmr7nTfWCABM3pm9 +k57ZZWqpGASQcoeSSRj66iXGQ5rH37nLsFaAL15VGegXRHTxmPwN7jzNET9Ynpk62um vhqZslSgJAWD+Cn+9IV+QyEz0U8Lc8S80e0eeK56FYrxgGHVGCFz+jmO/4G9Mo4+vjrn 7lMscMCwHr4rTrwkND0pcO7cINU8pCyxOsH2A1WJ/8tEfuEJ5zNewuqKsKN+qy5fwgVv teuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukd8z5IKigSiRxkkb5SoJwsmQJP69b78MNLHu6QpB4voyynjP5A/ DmPGBQp4NX9xver/Y/46gHoyKEsaHZbrWuOQb4WbyA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7iVphE/X9f+nPUiPN/Ix1R3IWEnLj2T8aVhAWMsbJ4r6Ja6exDI/PKhe7gPODpq+X0VasFy3pVoGH/VwIDj/k=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9ad0:: with SMTP id p16-v6mr654253ljj.102.1548220241707; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 21:10:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwZdRym=kj9qD1f8d9ShNL3o09f+gGbyc2Q-1F1HtsMpYQ@mail.gmail.com> <B9E281E0-D50B-4D34-A392-76F7FE2E82B8@kitterman.com>
In-Reply-To: <B9E281E0-D50B-4D34-A392-76F7FE2E82B8@kitterman.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 21:10:27 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYWVjj7pVnA4ouSTi0u=CBbQ0bSog6pQBrUghtD9v8pmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008a88880580191d2f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/yNX-0A8jjSApSevchZp0qTmPkBE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Post-IESG Review edits to RFC7601bis
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 05:10:46 -0000

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:09 PM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> According to the rules of the registry (as described in RFC 7601), a
> designated expert can change entries to deprecated without a specification.
>

True, but that's not the only change here.  Not carrying deprecated entries
into 7601bis was identified as something cleaner than carrying them forward
and then immediately deprecating them.

No need to tie this to 7601bis.  Just ask IANA to make the changes (since
> you're the primary designated expert).


Yes, but since I'm also editing this thing now anyway, I may as well take
advantage of it.  And this way the audit trail is more visible, if that
matters to someone.

-MSK