Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #4 (Definition of "fo" parameter) - With Interim Notes

Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> Thu, 17 June 2021 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <todd.herr@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4703A1FF3 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3mu6d6mC-A1y for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A3FA3A1FEA for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id o19so4688378qtp.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ZsNRkUVcyq+jVpWXGqNMSfcaayANJpzgDoO+QvZ5xSo=; b=MCe3Ypn2IsgO7gNB+thlBZUWls4yzbUGUBIXugACYkqOsGFHvNmlg7yRcySO73q3La QrRul6RRvl+fEhz2S6s0wFEy3Vp3To9XfUCT+tJ7fyva/9DKYd/Gh1JkBDuNWnEbQVBO 7VBYoxfYDXvYWAJ13iKTAXc7dtxjJ1XER8/fkdMjak32dygKqHe3lqC9zmjEXh6z4RIN NFi7FaaJFUPsPH3YTIaVdApmqpee7s8OqIR2nfns27G3GhuYGsUYUiNZLYqMiixPLLMP rTjUCdcC1QGzi0ZFd3eo4/U/9d9IiTDNfd4N05WilvqaGSohc0uX0osySN2kn1gOza3Y 1Dsg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ZsNRkUVcyq+jVpWXGqNMSfcaayANJpzgDoO+QvZ5xSo=; b=CZ1gHb/owcdC2mD9MiIGKOW7FgAsZWD3XW3i58Ld+J/Fh057LmCU1ADbUw39gzfFf/ I1xTViF37iuZ1cdsKBkI6a27p08sqeRQPKdkC3E6pxRXeRIOxyB7WJc0n8Qyex8oZ34D LJubEcBUWTwRN5269artozF3elVg99uBnlw8Jq58XqJE/ytBIh4rLEI+Mq68Gdp/mHX8 ZNIG7HUJFS8oItKi/74Zwp06ePYYB2L6W1kRbtv0lBx6J3//3BI+wwY4BF075O9oRUEe 8ac1maCAPlur56bHrHtO3AB25LXeScSxKZjoTXll/fsyDkQzV4/ASN8rY24h24HUOAn0 cA4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532jhfkwZmgnll1JaznYWQzJr+2kcbS8gUoobmYOWU12D4LJDdCs jxXQyhNvszuWVZRkSeO1Ya5cLS8xE213fPb/3tANjWRHOoSHfg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzeyR3LTQ774QHUiOCOImR1XITsJAtIeM199BnQ+9WVjNRj8bARcqQ0LTWocvlSLi0X1eyr+5GeZlCGgrATlvI=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5f93:: with SMTP id j19mr5188077qta.298.1623936949222; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHej_8mp7KtnqaH8fEAHTjoeN63tm_QL_L8b3oS4qbLBh-Zv0A@mail.gmail.com> <e01d76ea-449a-8a59-f5a5-5aeaabf7e2d8@crash.com>
In-Reply-To: <e01d76ea-449a-8a59-f5a5-5aeaabf7e2d8@crash.com>
From: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:35:33 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHej_8mjK7sARFQhYnONqbzRxjh=GZx1n1xm2ccfd39kdP+Bsw@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ff1d5d05c4f648f9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/yyd99XoLsKRI8QuYrhx2e2CNsWw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #4 (Definition of "fo" parameter) - With Interim Notes
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:35:58 -0000

I have closed the subject ticket and incorporated relevant text
changes in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-02,
which will be published on Datatracker as soon as the chairs have a chance
to do so.

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:29 PM Steven M Jones <smj@crash.com> wrote:

> On 5/28/21 08:43, Todd Herr wrote:
>
>
> Consensus on Ticket #4 <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/4>(Definition
> of "fo" parameter) was reached during the May 27 DMARC Interim to update
> the definition of the "fo" parameter with the following sentence, as shown
> in dmarcbis-01:
>
> The value of this tag is either "0", "1", or a colon-separated list of the
> options represented by alphabetic characters.
>
>
> It is understood from the discussion that ABNF for the "fo" tag will have
> to be updated, and this update will happen in the next version of dmarcbis,
> scheduled for release in the next few weeks.
>
>
> I support the proposed change.
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>


-- 

*Todd Herr* | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem
*e:* todd.herr@valimail.com
*m:* 703.220.4153

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.