IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11.txt

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 20 March 2021 00:18 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB043A14FB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZYPlcS1BKELk for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x232.google.com (mail-oi1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F0B33A14FA for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x232.google.com with SMTP id n140so6606016oig.9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XOBJ8ITD5p4LCYcuAPDN79lGh0Hi+UxVLCrwgUo/wnc=; b=j32vDcz8fnLK6y0F0IcxeuXGmB5mHruEy3lTRZ+QnNubLMnqYa7m7eiB1Z+njmIXJY dWQ5BsbdSLEglSHeWE2/Tbq/ZxFiZAcKuiAkxRGJgUW7Vq+CrmhNre2jvF7/ZUI/XxIE 9DfXt/F0X4CuQpv3L8Q5ubq3aIYCe6xbjFmzn0i7WTQKEI9u+y78CVBrjV0VJ/7dfxwE lBIf7skarUFE9gmc2YKzLciJYSCHAcXII3y1IHcuYHPSKvj6/7ZaOmEaG/MmhawO5PA8 yKvQ1Q7gKzZfpXke5At0Wyy6RtoEsYVa+jzyKrmTwEE/9gaEY7cnLgW2En2TLWc6NLTo Ci0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XOBJ8ITD5p4LCYcuAPDN79lGh0Hi+UxVLCrwgUo/wnc=; b=Bc5NnACpzslVvcwE6LjUyctoZaRfHRru/Nl1U4QXzkTi2bNIjQSRgPQSufdyXwsWqC zb0RWBzto1TEI+MiD3LuT4neN5Pk29nBSYqyNP8BROi4XSIDWTPvvfxTtko6IPRSTROl kx1B94jxj0uRBeXFGVUCVFb7KtuGg+2jzYaP8ySx1lv3vW6XG68Czmvym+ajuOH1XEMs gH1Ab+EgN42dtW4pDMQe9Xe07W+7z1KrKFRUlorVYSIkln7+0i3F8eh6kKva+5b4BJ/8 xOwrtS7i0Q5ZmzRxRhmH/iWnmfsl4tl5T2qnDgLmXdhapBAuzt2yLZ4UpL9r83u+tNFn tzjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531VRNDX6Q4rWK7BCNPpHNQv7guTtRpLjLJHlrmoo6+XmufXLbn1 Adxy75QpEf1MMo/N7DPoDZgeyGFir/3oODU8i64=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJykTlg4aVHpdMZswycYSSLJnnJU8DF/wJLBU88qqgQD+Dg+8R+KukQxcqLOiMim/TnSUyOSG7C8Grs1KZt5kwI=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:d64f:: with SMTP id n76mr2806555oig.45.1616199483156; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161616297099.26288.5532647192522385084@ietfa.amsl.com> <b6acffdb-9700-b078-6cd2-e76d7f677f32@tana.it> <CAL0qLwauWO2EtW=WhJPTr52Ru9w4wKj_HqSTEQyEk1+MrEMdjQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwauWO2EtW=WhJPTr52Ru9w4wKj_HqSTEQyEk1+MrEMdjQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 20:17:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+E1VPi8=iA7utvSFHMVV5aVMbwyY=zwtuGm=-uk7=-GYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000146bc605bdecc42f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/z_azE-JZx037MNHAjYt9OhLlHQ8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 00:18:07 -0000

Agree with Murray.

Also, I see changing "Algorithm" to "Specification" makes sense.

looking at the other suggestions

tim

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:54 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Just to nit-pick:
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:28 AM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:
>
>> There's still a few style points that I'd propose.  They can be dealt
>> with in
>> auth48.
>>
>
> After Last Call, please.  Don't wait for AUTH48 to process this feedback.
>
> -MSK
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email