Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=quarantine

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Mon, 14 December 2020 20:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A893A1A64 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:07:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id At7VLC6hugil for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:07:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com (mail-pl1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA8DA3A1A62 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:07:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id x18so3294670pln.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:07:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=wzs4IPgvrJZNtlfh9E9t5UD5CJTI0fNVTmHxFThz52g=; b=jtQ58vJI9gQVXPTGwyLTQcg3qtX8pM5BkLQx6kUNkRdEAZaY0fCOcg9/DyjtW/BGUM L4KGWmbTewy/pqZ/kXNK9/0olng4zmRSVhty2buZXzMbFdvJd4voLz8MHB29U0Bm2Ou1 ajeZncTHx5h2IZmiBkHrIthilZcf5ES6c7ffiAmrELlLxEl5IY8LEzIZmBD80jTo0B5s Tz9G4ocFzvHVMH8uCZfuKRbXnYxP+6+21/znyJNFMHMQredkV0pmP0vOdtk0NS1zlBJ5 +e0QkWVHtWCKpt08YFrCt5Obry8rybUTpYruUUpq5XpOm520qlM3lf2djqFKfLldTA2n bkrQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=wzs4IPgvrJZNtlfh9E9t5UD5CJTI0fNVTmHxFThz52g=; b=t7BSDULnXgL3TqzEYyLwnXCoMdzeUXoug7bYBg4OX3+kLises+7RV//65vFt0E4cnm a54rq7r0Vs1trWLxWgpKr8VXtJ+kJH+ZUoU4Qpx+GLAutTO488bhYy/7zeXBpitlI0o+ zPz2SGwivdS+L+HmP/iT3ndevbKmMIiDto9X7QiWWD8hJGoJx9pdx0jtRLmW4NX2QrTZ wo+nWQ5pNqwKbT7wfV517RXmfIFd19gxi5e7wvNEXrmhu+4x/xNmdEBBE2Ujk9aJxnNT VHMtrGTgo07+hi6y9wOzV848GRFSUQXdPRYbSrOiF7Og542ul2NwoYQf4TCCIOrRw8PN 4H0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531daYLHCcNSTkQ8M70Re5LLVSTRL+tC5ZfL13Vq67+eo+m/OoYW PqlPGoPtmSGqkhEMWvVssYoOq3sW99blUQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxKNT1cCyq9VHsx9y5CpeU6K8MJpQG8SgBugr3QCEW7K5ieJJaFQ3Amr3dCj8s7SGL9mWNWVg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ee11:b029:db:c0d6:581a with SMTP id z17-20020a170902ee11b02900dbc0d6581amr24427775plb.54.1607976426816; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:07:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan ([206.107.197.128]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t12sm17218768pgu.75.2020.12.14.12.07.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:07:05 -0800 (PST)
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <20201211173722.6B4DF29782C7@ary.qy> <ea074aad-971b-abc6-d557-ea2f433b3cc7@gmail.com> <f55992cf-f5b3-42b6-4a38-b184d9243f32@mtcc.com> <52077ae3-0b6a-8532-d21d-4f5b51413ded@dcrocker.net> <4289adb4-4ea2-7e4a-2a33-37608fc2e86e@mtcc.com> <7fed242e-a59c-350d-983b-4701146afa9d@dcrocker.net> <c445cd5a-bf6f-0968-49e7-70ef0ad492d5@mtcc.com> <CADyWQ+HrG3A2kTxCLY7EN3AS7K=SaNuoCF3PwEA83Bi_e4XumQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <8170c931-0abe-f7c9-ca7d-e6c78ee9033f@mtcc.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:07:04 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+HrG3A2kTxCLY7EN3AS7K=SaNuoCF3PwEA83Bi_e4XumQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------350E572A6567B1CDF0E59BC6"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/zkMFt_oF1O_Ok1JGkCrg3ZR1-vQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] p=quarantine
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:07:09 -0000

On 12/14/20 12:02 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> All
>
> Can we please stop with the non constructive discussions here?
>

It would be helpful to just rule anything about the semantics of 
p=reject as out of scope. It is what hijacked my original question for 
which I haven't gotten an answer.

Mike