Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..

Hello folks,

I have asked this same question many times, in different words...

Namely, if we design a solution that fits the requirements, and bridges
the gaps as analyzed in the gap analysis document, have we succeeded?

Or, is there a requirement for the work to be adopted by 3GPP?

What if we design for IEEE 802 Wireless, which is currently carrying the
preponderance of the world's wireless data, and will almost assuredly
continue to carry a greater proportion?

Regards
Charlie P.

On 9/4/2014 3:14 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> ....
>
> In DMM, precedents and the keen NETEXT, there seems to be a
> hard-rooted disconnect between the product developped - (P)Mobile IP -
> and the deployments.  We know for a fact that 3GPP deployments
> (2G/3G/4G) do not use (P)Mobile IP.  We also know that 3GPP specs do
> mention Mobile IP. To such a point that I wonder whether 3GPP has not
> the same disconnect as here.
>
> On another hand, we do have indications of where (P)Mobile IP is used
> - the trials, the projects, the kernel code, and not least the
> slideware attracting real customers.
>
> The worry: develop DMM protocol while continuing the disconnect.
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> dmm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>

-- 
Regards,
Charlie P.