Re: [DMM] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-05: (with COMMENT)

CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Sun, 08 March 2020 12:11 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6893A0593 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 05:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=it.uc3m.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vgZLcyvivmAk for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 05:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BDFB3A05A7 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 05:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id y3so8550362edj.13 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 05:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=it.uc3m.es; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=k1o40GfQfsaIF9ps8V0mysTXZbYLfELvv3v/FLtmZds=; b=jjhDuywPJvSmt54PkmdyJH0ED6nWJJYP7lWydYNiL4v/3fVIsA8VzMf15Y8WEKnOMf pU9jrtH9aV0WsUGZ6pZGUI7L/cbat+9shtJ3u49V9ab1paGmhw3CMGDGIi5h5fAl9tDe iDOhXxJhXfxUl8hpAcN3NdxUSLx7LboeDIFX7KU3jKsZNWMJGE7u3ZMYkLTPRrQ0Z/se SBoqdhmYJsXlM9ZEjSPFKDNQ+AZXqv9L/iNZiWyIYzjRzs4/kE+58FHMARkGQ220PbzB R0ADzWoXT5KRckCyEuCgcmBpT5E4Jh+qwD3eybYmhvVHVrDiCOmfbrdkhnH+pkBINyFQ Cc5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k1o40GfQfsaIF9ps8V0mysTXZbYLfELvv3v/FLtmZds=; b=pX7jcEUdl20MW0MFw4aez7BoAEG9lU72U26yUrk0+Q3j+akcjpMmtJWCFFAnKZuK1g PWDKDh0/4tgHf7dQEVsyWCOXQCTdExwpJb2jTZnNhLtTm7u13Faj97Uq+2uHEqkrV6RR vSsm1zyHgf793MKDtRxI21wrD0+EoJjVlEkLj/yQhJMdoqQNqEfCXumKIcraMIHuBJnl UP0HmQ13QAPK5G6WI6CdTaIQX0BeFdmZ3SkGsEKzyXnGhpl0LCe2z80iSqa0rQfbsDPY jx0SyJEroyt/4v/13eszA6qiPGKc+iMMYeZXRzZZ4AMUW4pEKhdwUGoeg+ggpH3C39nh DmVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2ra1IvIYnC0A0SVReROdpbSIipEs01w79fSvR6kPFfKMDR7+eT JUZLfC8e1YJaTR3oYATGImylBRgo4TnXUycxLrTqXA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vv5/TsJEJ9jgtZl/1GM0PRyId7BkcigxkXqwkF3?= =?utf-8?q?vZx7WR/nl/e5M+VaYjT0rgEnbdlBNbSBvWOcoqxKJBRoJGw=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ca53:: with SMTP id jx19mr11188076ejb.192.1583669514807; Sun, 08 Mar 2020 05:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158338560241.29408.3648898527474669779@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158338560241.29408.3648898527474669779@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 13:11:37 +0100
Message-ID: <CALypLp-yNkr9NYsLYHSgV_vXr29c7gdXSnumqc7aU8qOau1yUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif@ietf.org, dmm-chairs <dmm-chairs@ietf.org>, dmm <dmm@ietf.org>, Dapeng Liu <max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000df534105a056ca3d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/4uHy_SCrQMSOB8Fx2-VBJUsORFk>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 12:11:59 -0000

Hi Adam,

Thanks a lot for your review. Please see inline below for my comments.

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:20 AM Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
wrote:

> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-05: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for the work on this document. I have only one editorial suggestion.
>
> Section 3.6:
>
> >   to-point link) with MN1, exposing itself as a (logical) router with a
> >   specific MAC (e.g., 00:11:22:33:01:01) and IPv6 addresses (e.g.,
>
> Please use a MAC address from the range reserved for documentation
> purposes by
> section 2.1.1 of RFC 7042.
>

[CB] Thanks. Addressing a comment from Éric I've ended up removing the MAC
address in the text, so this is not necessary, though I'll keep it in mind
in case we need to mention a MAC address.

Thanks,

Carlos