Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..

On Sep 4, 2014, at 1:31 PM, Charles E. Perkins wrote:

> 
> Hello folks,
> 
> I have asked this same question many times, in different words...
> 
> Namely, if we design a solution that fits the requirements, and bridges
> the gaps as analyzed in the gap analysis document, have we succeeded?
> 
> Or, is there a requirement for the work to be adopted by 3GPP?

It would be cool but not required.

> What if we design for IEEE 802 Wireless, which is currently carrying the
> preponderance of the world's wireless data, and will almost assuredly
> continue to carry a greater proportion?

..and if the solution were adopted that would count as a major success.

- JOuni

> 
> Regards
> Charlie P.
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/4/2014 3:14 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> ....
>> 
>> In DMM, precedents and the keen NETEXT, there seems to be a
>> hard-rooted disconnect between the product developped - (P)Mobile IP -
>> and the deployments.  We know for a fact that 3GPP deployments
>> (2G/3G/4G) do not use (P)Mobile IP.  We also know that 3GPP specs do
>> mention Mobile IP. To such a point that I wonder whether 3GPP has not
>> the same disconnect as here.
>> 
>> On another hand, we do have indications of where (P)Mobile IP is used
>> - the trials, the projects, the kernel code, and not least the
>> slideware attracting real customers.
>> 
>> The worry: develop DMM protocol while continuing the disconnect.
>> 
>> Alex
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmm mailing list
>>> dmm@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> dmm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm