Re: [DMM] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-14: (with COMMENT)

CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Sat, 07 March 2020 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473B33A1648 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 09:04:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=it.uc3m.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VS4vH8_qzHxt for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 09:03:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BDA33A1649 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 09:03:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id a20so618193edj.2 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 09:03:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=it.uc3m.es; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/43tNNxkD2udX13tspDGHRGUPwIKWlMsYAGH/ItMkT8=; b=H5YGdcZtYyIgDYD3Gh86RzYeR9gwc2a5qTTdAC2pBwHCGWH07gXOGzAdBEFnhxtbO3 qcjx7fMRayels8UMHmZLZ514DewX++fLiI8Tppi2+l7d5btn2Axt/GVM/Ru51giu7Vi3 1z28jDsC0gvcqN3WeNmczOWlNQUaaowm04ZnP85tJNk8EWTnXW+g/LwYb2oXJdxCswPc Vf72kstwIcmlTbe+ihTxohSdr5mglzOVnRdVAaEMdqkBds0jKXglm0LsHsLFPSiZ1cty Dexlvc+jE+aSHve8sp8ae9SfTcdh1I28cEfb7Lrr2Yo59P6IsNBQsSLAZICat8k8hPmk ajUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/43tNNxkD2udX13tspDGHRGUPwIKWlMsYAGH/ItMkT8=; b=pU5tQ2L3t71QXspjQK5QxW6l1wSCaJSiIIAiZ5yprPZAyQaVNit3TspnXXE+0AjKdq 294As9LEPHJO+mSB6sMK7M9Y1TfIpVq7gI3RO2g/Bi3P7G9BRm4wOZ6dUlSEzHz5wVYa FyNSdB78aOdUMHXMvvq2wqDLn9S1mfqrAQsYLwv+apIwaaYCO/qM+jzmBadGHWohpiUi K9njJVVyJrYKYUeJp8hT064Gj1sCLxW2h3P4d1hUoIZ8pqEF77Av4s3K2U929kh8zhz3 6TN9XjTR4qtKWhJIbvqABgy5gx2PXi0O8JrbUK/aB+0x30x4goO2zZrcckKBJV3NcwIQ d86g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1zvSvZjmQP3JpYfFZhQQySkNQARG2ZIuundqNXt+LU2npwZZwV gwbOOOo8+7vytyphK02u4JbQ7IZb/TZKy7Hk4rhzSw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vv+KCtmiN1xzu0m4dVd6Ez0Vu2Cto3/8jiO9UkC?= =?utf-8?q?I3YcvKZu98Rts4/Gb9nqB4fd2sK0522mMdraYONFNMZIB7c=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dd1a:: with SMTP id i26mr9036665edv.321.1583600636517; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 09:03:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158338619598.29359.1563714463313257220@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158338619598.29359.1563714463313257220@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 18:03:39 +0100
Message-ID: <CALypLp9p=iwwbsDfVYJOXKXpafSbKmxb9r62gFQL+wL-4makEQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring@ietf.org, dmm-chairs <dmm-chairs@ietf.org>, dmm <dmm@ietf.org>, Dapeng Liu <maxpassion@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000682e8f05a046c166"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/8Fc8ugQ6f3MT5JR6K-H7JBDCGpE>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 17:04:00 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 17:04:00 -0000

Hi Roman,

Thanks for your review. Please see inline below.

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:29 AM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-14: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I support Ben Kaduk’s DISCUSS point.
>

[CB] I've just replied to Benjamin's review, addressing all his comments.


>
> Section 5.  To provide symmetry with the IPSec recommendation, s/IKEv2
> should/IKEv2 SHOULD/
>
>
> [CB] OK, fixed in version -15 to be submitted. Thanks.

Carlos