Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Fri, 25 July 2014 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7461B29B8 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KJeKgpqXS7ia for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FA901A03F4 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id s18so3189079lam.0 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=GvPZEW3uKBAXz6OKYRLvdg0Lt9CZu8uDqshCJyKvz2E=; b=iZY/FKnGAGg5hC8QD9uiUed5BUIj3WdMQWLjEQnwtCfWZPqXOZnxUoIZoePYZTmytj EvtyVePJtyqmLcb6IIOvRN9FCmWFKIAih18ongbO14LrDOtXChQPEvckbNENjnHkkqKU 7ndw4U3ppeeX12LFLI2fT1FObptUpHZS6Tz6a2HenDFgTAoYOq7U79fhCs5CrCidBDQk LXFJj/XdP+Q+nzHi+SSpElNrEPjYd8y/JAPoDi7ldi/zoJpPtK34mBVQam7mPdkXzBiB kIkdKP5iq5EEcS9q1+i6V7b/Gcfo+pE0RPhd4aHTaC6HRnvpOJ8X25OA/rIZaInZJZJU TX9w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.167.67 with SMTP id zm3mr15983499lbb.27.1406300197170; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.191.228 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53D18608.9090003@innovationslab.net>
References: <53D17F75.3030207@gmail.com> <CAC8QAceH3aYiV_HB9uok1_OQ5=2bvjHONb=x6Dc28XW-KXOw4g@mail.gmail.com> <53D18608.9090003@innovationslab.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 09:56:37 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcfYG=rCdKGq6sqVeqWMwQh6k3NhRA9kXJ7chmkywiKtBw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/BXbvVQUGVyLjC7vwdrMIj5NBS_4
Cc: "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:56:40 -0000

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Brian Haberman
<brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/24/14 6:01 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>> Hi Jouni,
>>
>> Regarding
>>
>> Distributed mobility management deployment models and scenarios:
>>
>> As I said in the session today I am having trouble understanding the
>> deployment models.
>>
>> To me it sounds like doing the last thing first, i.e. after we get the
>> dmm solution we work on how to deploy it (of course if the deployment
>> has not already been considered by the solution).
>
> I may be interpreting the charter incorrectly, but I think there may be
> a disconnect.  I interpreted the the charter text as describing
> deployment models like:
>
> - Wi-Fi-based mobility management
>
> - Cellular (e.g., 3GPP) mobility management
>
> - Mixed technology mobility management
>
> - etc.
>
> If that above interpretation is what was intended, I think it makes
> sense to have that type of description available to guide solution
> development.
>
> If the above is not correct, then I suspect the charter needs some
> clarification.
>

If that is the case then I suggest calling it DMM usage scenarios or
use cases in real networks?

Use case work is done before solution work, so that I think is a good
match with DMM.

Regards,

Behcet
> Regards,
> Brian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>