Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..

"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> Thu, 11 September 2014 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B030B1A893A for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.153
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.153 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QV7ta5RYY1yQ for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2609C1A8952 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=837; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1410455537; x=1411665137; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=MxQ09UcFuzwSJDz83w3T/++x9qUf/Nl386lyUScdZEY=; b=PwxsNBj3p77OeT+qZjYay4CLJJMODoQckq/f9Y27IFMCaq2JGXI2YBIg 7/Hsmyh+FD08lQ/7iqpsEV+5lcif4193s2hJXkI1ude2CUFenIyzlDYXF 7koLrgwn+QM/rBtvs4th1m8PzNVvTrqTpP+SOsC61DrR5jCy3sCvLxLds I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiEFAG/XEVStJA2N/2dsb2JhbABfgw2BKgTQFQGBERZ4hAMBAQEEOj8MBgEIEQQBAR8JORQJCAIEAQ0FiEK/DwEXjyIrBwaERgEEkUuLNpU7g2FsgUiBBwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,506,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="354492186"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2014 17:12:16 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8BHCGl4029271 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:12:16 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.6.21]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:12:16 -0500
From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: Marco Liebsch <Marco.Liebsch@neclab.eu>, Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
Thread-Index: AQHPzeOIFTJi/s504kOP81QcxzozOA==
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:12:15 +0000
Message-ID: <D0372596.163DC1%sgundave@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <69756203DDDDE64E987BC4F70B71A26D91A6467C@DAPHNIS.office.hd>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.21.64.105]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <D126F5AD702744408E81E9E8DC1F822C@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/JDYN__S_mvKxdvrmAB6PWZw7HIM
Cc: Vijay Devarapalli <dvijay@rocketmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:12:21 -0000

Hi Marco,


On 9/11/14 9:16 AM, "Marco Liebsch" <Marco.Liebsch@neclab.eu> wrote:

>Hi Sri, please see inline.
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgundave@cisco.com]
>>Sent: Donnerstag, 11. September 2014 15:58
>>To: Marco Liebsch; Charlie Perkins; dmm@ietf.org
>>Cc: Vijay Devarapalli
>>Subject: Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
>>
>>I do not see a reason why multiple MN-Id instances need to be present in
>>a
>>single message ? In my experience, this is strictly a deployment
>>consideration,
>>when to use what type of identifiers.
>
>Then there is no issue and it's the cleanest approach. Multiple IDs
>possible,
>deployment determines which type to use, single MNID present. Done.



Ack. That will have least impact on the existing specs.



Regards
Sri