Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..

Le 03/09/2014 20:53, Brian Haberman a écrit :
> Behcet,
>
> On 9/3/14 2:33 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>>
>> You don't seem to understand my points.
>
> That is quite possible.  Your comment on the list was "I am against any
> deployment work before we decide on a solution..."
>
> I read that as an objection to having the deployment models work item on
> the agenda.  Please do tell me what I am missing.
>
> Regards,
> Brian

Hi,

I am following the discussion and me too I do not quite understand what 
is the complain.

I am happy to learn that a if a WG is to be formed then it would be 
around a solution rather than just requirements or architecture.

That said, I would like to express a worry along similar lines.

In DMM, precedents and the keen NETEXT, there seems to be a hard-rooted 
disconnect between the product developped - (P)Mobile IP - and the 
deployments.  We know for a fact that 3GPP deployments (2G/3G/4G) do not 
use (P)Mobile IP.  We also know that 3GPP specs do mention Mobile IP. 
To such a point that I wonder whether 3GPP has not the same disconnect 
as here.

On another hand, we do have indications of where (P)Mobile IP is used - 
the trials, the projects, the kernel code, and not least the slideware 
attracting real customers.

The worry: develop DMM protocol while continuing the disconnect.

Alex

>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>