Re: [DMM] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-14: (with COMMENT)

[CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Warren. I've just replied to Qin's comments. The original
e-mail went to the wrong place due to some misconfigured filters :(

Version -15 (to be submitted soon) should address all the comments received.

Thanks,

Carlos

On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 1:37 AM Warren Kumari <[e-mail]> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 4:20 PM CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Warren,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments. I've checked my e-mail twice and I haven't
> been able to see the review from Qin Wu. Can you please forward it to me.
> According to my records I've replied to all the comments and reviews to
> this draft (I'm working on another one that is also at the IESG evaluation
> now -- draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif -- but this a different document).
> >
>
> All directorate reviews should be linked from the Datatracker page:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring/
> The direct link to Qin's is:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-13-opsdir-lc-wu-2019-10-02/
>
>
> > Apologies in advance if I've missed the review from Qin Wu.
> >
>
> Ah, fair enough, it is easy to miss emails, sometimes they go into spam,
> etc.
>
> W
>
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 7:57 PM Warren Kumari via Datatracker <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
> >> draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-14: No Objection
> >>
> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> >> introductory paragraph, however.)
> >>
> >>
> >> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >>
> >>
> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> >>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> COMMENT:
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> I am balloting NoObj, but I had a hard time deciding between this and
> DISCUSS
> >> (I went with NoObj because I'm submitting this late) - Qin Wu submitted
> an
> >> OpsDir review with a number of open questions, as well as some very
> easy to
> >> address comments / suggestions. It looks like this were either ignored,
> or
> >> missed (or, perhaps I missed the discussion)
> >>
> >> I strongly encourage the authors and AD to review and address these
> comments.
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
> --
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>    ---maf
>