IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] Comment to draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-03.txt and draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-07.txt

Shunsuke Homma <shunsuke.homma.fp@hco.ntt.co.jp> Wed, 08 January 2020 09:26 UTC

Return-Path: <shunsuke.homma.fp@hco.ntt.co.jp>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAF312002F for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 01:26:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.618
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.618 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JOZ_dIFtqXST for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 01:26:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dish-sg.nttdocomo.co.jp (dish-sg.nttdocomo.co.jp [202.19.227.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5424120024 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 01:26:24 -0800 (PST)
X-dD-Source: Outbound
Received: from zssg-mailmd104.ddreams.local (zssg-mailmd900.ddreams.local [10.160.172.63]) by zssg-mailou104.ddreams.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3B6120169; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 18:26:24 +0900 (JST)
Received: from zssg-mailcc301.ddreams.local (zssg-mailcc301.ddreams.local [10.160.162.152]) by zssg-mailmd104.ddreams.local (dDREAMS) with ESMTP id <0Q3S0101D7JZ1R80@dDREAMS>; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 18:26:23 +0900 (JST)
Received: from zssg-mailcc301 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zssg-mailcc301.ddreams.local (unknown) with SMTP id 0089QOfH018790; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 18:26:24 +0900
Received: from zssg-mailmf101.ddreams.local (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by zssg-mailmf101.ddreams.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843047E6034; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 18:26:15 +0900 (JST)
Received: from zssg-mailmf101.ddreams.local (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F578E6054; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 18:26:15 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with SMTP id 77CE58E6051; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 18:26:15 +0900 (JST)
X-IMSS-HAND-OFF-DIRECTIVE: localhost:10026
Received: from zssg-mailmf101.ddreams.local (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD598E6055; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 18:26:14 +0900 (JST)
Received: from zssg-mailua101.ddreams.local (unknown [10.160.172.62]) by zssg-mailmf101.ddreams.local (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 18:26:14 +0900 (JST)
Received: from rcR9101318 (unknown [10.171.96.193]) by zssg-mailua101.ddreams.local (dDREAMS) with ESMTPA id <0Q3S00VXB7JN4F60@dDREAMS>; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 18:26:11 +0900 (JST)
From: Shunsuke Homma <shunsuke.homma.fp@hco.ntt.co.jp>
References: <HE1PR07MB3306F9EC173131B3D4F5F9049B200@HE1PR07MB3306.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-reply-to: <HE1PR07MB3306F9EC173131B3D4F5F9049B200@HE1PR07MB3306.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 18:26:11 +0900
Message-id: <000401d5c605$aac3c330$004b4990$@hco.ntt.co.jp_1>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01D5C651.1AAC7CA0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-index: AQKdVX08HRSc+Z0b3AXWHCPcUiYYyKZRX83w
Content-language: ja
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
To: "'Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)'" <hannu.flinck@nokia-bell-labs.com>, dmm@ietf.org
X-CC-Mail-RelayStamp: CC/Mail Relayed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/WISNieabcMSetxdDt_RDRu5NFe8>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Comment to draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-03.txt and draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-07.txt
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 09:26:27 -0000

Hi Hannu,

 

Thank you for your comment. 

 

Actually, draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis was started as related work of UPPS in 3GPP, but this is neutral analysis of 5G user
plane and not tied to specific IETF protocol. Thus,  it seems not appropriate to conclude with description related to SRv6, an IETF
specific protocol.

 

Also, if some of dmm folks can recognize worth on this work itself, we will be able to change the introduction and conclusion to be
independent of UPPS.

 

Anyway, we'll consider conclusion of this document.

 

Thank you very much.

 

Regards,

 

Shunsuke

 

From: dmm <dmm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2020 8:55 PM
To: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: [DMM] Comment to draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-03.txt and draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-07.txt

 

Hello 

 

Draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-03.txt says that "This work is corresponding to the User Plane Protocol Study work on 3GPP side."

 

In order to appreciate that intent and to keep 3GPP and DMM views somehow aligned, I would suggest that in this document and
preferably also in draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-07.txt you will add a mentioning about outcome of the 3GPP user plan study that
concludes that "3GPP has concluded to not standardize the SRv6 user plane protocol" [TR29.892].

 

 

Best regards

Hannu

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email