IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11

"Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Mon, 21 January 2019 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050D7126C7E for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:09:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DXYFbtOfTZ5w for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:09:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net [130.76.144.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D94BC127B4C for <dmm@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:09:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id x0LI9lds009742; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:09:47 -0500
Received: from XCH16-07-12.nos.boeing.com (xch16-07-12.nos.boeing.com [144.115.66.114]) by clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id x0LI9cSB008378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:09:38 -0500
Received: from XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.112) by XCH16-07-12.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.1.1591.10; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:09:36 -0800
Received: from XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::e065:4e77:ac47:d9a8]) by XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::e065:4e77:ac47:d9a8%2]) with mapi id 15.01.1591.012; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:09:36 -0800
From: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
CC: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11
Thread-Index: AQHUqEsyaVwhC6gsjkGTHCexOaG4/6WyjgZwgAYc6oCAAWnYMA==
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:09:36 +0000
Message-ID: <1e9dec4a74084a66819f34d65c61217b@boeing.com>
References: <D85B80C5.2E3462%sgundave@cisco.com> <4e6e476e61a342569edf2c126543c1d5@boeing.com> <CALypLp-K7jGYAnu+C668TkgzJZNtppBraTazE-o7TnP9CBswqg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALypLp-K7jGYAnu+C668TkgzJZNtppBraTazE-o7TnP9CBswqg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [137.137.12.6]
x-tm-snts-smtp: FDBB42236E29EE06D20BC73940030B29347E649BA32787FE22B2E44DC4BD986D2000:8
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1e9dec4a74084a66819f34d65c61217bboeingcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/ZSr9rBDkY6siNBY6oyMd2DcOeUs>
Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:09:54 -0000

Hi Carlos,

I think it would be worth considering this model both on its own merits and/or
in conjunction with the dmm document. The notion of a “home network” need
not be preserved, and instead we have scalable de-aggregation. Please have a
look (as I did for the dmm doc) and post comments or questions.

I think this is already considered in the " Mobility case, anchor relocation" in the draft. We can add additional references as examples of this, but I'd prefer not to add more text, as we are trying to keep the document short and what you have described is covered IMHO with the current text.

>> Scalable de-aggregation (and the routing system required to  route it ) is not covered in
>> ‘draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring’; it is covered in ‘draft-ietf-rtgwg-atn-bgp’
>> (a wg item of the RTGWG) and ‘draft-templin-intarea-6706bis’ from which the RTGWG
>> doc was derived. Please add references and supporting text.
>>
>> Thanks - Fred

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email