IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..

"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> Tue, 09 September 2014 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48B11A0013 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.153
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.153 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16FjeyL0S4d4 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 411D11A00C2 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 11:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=776; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1410289019; x=1411498619; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=q+EaOe03YmfWmbNypB0GeaVDLCTEguCuNjPuApOd9Zo=; b=KvsKWqrMQOO2YWMWnMU8OhwHBSKyFK8FtfSwUVXtee1Cb5abMbXCzofo FJATYxjSWygaGY1Lhyw/oWz0PwiP+R4y1rIJuxRTn4rCs8mCqeHjYJn7S 8F+r5v+5bdTQAw9nDYfdTfjoYEeuAs5nhsKSEiQoZmsM8Xax/qPGP/OhG 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiQFAFhMD1StJV2T/2dsb2JhbABZgw2BKgTRcgGBDRZ4hAQBAQQ6UQEIGB5CJQIEARKIQr0xARePVIRMAQSRQYsylS6DYWyBSIEHAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,492,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="76384690"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Sep 2014 18:56:58 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com [173.37.183.78]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s89IuwCh006606 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 18:56:58 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.6.21]) by xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([fe80::200:5efe:173.37.183.34%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 13:56:58 -0500
From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
Thread-Index: AQHPzF/UFTJi/s504kOP81QcxzozOA==
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:56:58 +0000
Message-ID: <D0349A44.162790%sgundave@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <540F4B81.4040408@innovationslab.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.32.246.217]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <DAE8CEDBA4C0D14E9617C2D74B5A2EA2@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/_i5TF6QhPh96HY78sOCaC9xDR1o
Subject: Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:57:01 -0000

Hi Brian,

It might worth adding a note in the IANA page. I will send a request to
IANA.

We refer to the "Mobile Node Identifier option" in all MIP/PMIP specs and
the search from IANA page ends in the Mobile Node Identifier option
defined for ICMP. 

Regards
Sri

 





On 9/9/14 11:48 AM, "Brian Haberman" <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:

>Sri,
>
>On 9/9/14 2:09 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote:
>> Hi Suresh,
>> 
>> Thanks. That makes sense. Now, I remember that spec/update.
>> 
>> The option name conflict and my search not finding 4283 references threw
>> me off. Thanks.
>> 
>
>If this is *really* confusing, it may be worth updating the name of one
>of them.
>
>Not sure if it is or not...
>
>Brian
>
>> 
>>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email