Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

["Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <[e-mail]>]

Folks:

We have reviewed the feedback on the adoption call. There is generally interest for this work and with couple of folks objecting to the work. We gave the authors and the reviewers to discuss offline and make sure the concerns are addressed. We asked for substantial feedback on the concerns, but we did not get such detailed feedback.  Therefore, we have now concluded that there is interest for this work, and rough consensus for taking this up as a WG document.  The WG will have the opportunity to address any comments and concerns as we develop this document and before we think it is ready for WGLC.  This is again a baseline version and the WG can propose the needed changes and make sure we get this right.

With that note, we would like to ask the authors to submit draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as draft-ietf- dmm-tn-aware-mobility-00.

Thank you for all the feedback.

Sri



From: dmm <[e-mail]> on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave=[e-mail]>
Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 10:43 AM
To: dmm <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

Thank you all. This adoption call is now closed. We will review the feedback.


  *   Chairs


From: dmm <[e-mail]> on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave=[e-mail]>
Date: Thursday, January 14, 2021 at 10:56 AM
To: dmm <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

Gentle reminder.

This adoption call with expire on 18th Jan. Please provide your feedback.

Just to structure the discussion, we want to understand a.) if the WG agrees with the problem statement and is relevant for mobility working group, b.) is the proposed solution/approach is a reasonable approach, and if it is a good starting point

On the comments on where this work needs to happen etc , feedback is welcome but I would not worry too much about that now. Let’s agree upon the problem statement first and focus more on the technical aspects. If this is a valid problem, we can always decide to do that work here, or in some other group and that’s based on AD/Chair inputs and  on the review expertise that is needed for this work completion.

-Chairs





From: dmm <[e-mail]> on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave=[e-mail]>
Date: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 at 10:45 AM
To: dmm <[e-mail]>
Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

Folks:

The authors of the document, Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G, have presented the proposal and the need for standardization in multiple IETF WG meetings. There have been good amount of discussions in the mailers and there is some level of interest for the work from the community. We are therefore considering the adoption of this document as a DMM WG document, to be moved on Informational Standards track.

Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08


With this background, we would like to ask the WG to provide some feedback on their interest for this work. Please provide substantial comments as why this SHOULD be adopted, or why it SHOULD NOT be adopted. If there is interest, and if there are no other concerns from AD/IESG/Others, then we may take up this work.

The adoption call will end on 18th of January, 2021.

Regards
DMM WG Chairs