Re: [DMM] Call for Agenda: IETF110 DMM

Miya Kohno <miya.kohno@gmail.com> Sat, 06 March 2021 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <miya.kohno@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C893A0D60; Sat, 6 Mar 2021 06:24:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jyI_bOY4Vn-v; Sat, 6 Mar 2021 06:24:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32b.google.com (mail-ot1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 851143A0D5D; Sat, 6 Mar 2021 06:24:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id t16so4726645ott.3; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 06:24:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RW6HUGQ71bf0aV3xFZZCMMn96qxY9Pr6+Y64zIWAA9Y=; b=D7yEzbExv7fjwXiVJI4YeWbMl7pcqCHbKIJHQDYTs+IoDr8TGHwUyOH0VkkNmQWC6Q t5Y5NA14VQN/uKn5OfD1ZAIjtNOh3/LIB4T62n0Lf4ujmc8dFJuZdpgSgXBB/GkV9gv9 K6srSp8oyUQ5NGoGWP9A5GMVT6RODOoFcfxni+upY0IVLEeMqrLpugsrwrsM7TfairJO QBYK0LmHkZ2/MjAmoRyQSHs1e7ZDmR6NY7vz6IInKZDoGVWXW4PwUUVerTK/t+JCBltT OTpWxMmlmHn+frEjd0B9g+S4qjSFysoTB+zjUFRkeVbi2v9wLy9sWf0YFeqxGIa7r3aT RQ6w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RW6HUGQ71bf0aV3xFZZCMMn96qxY9Pr6+Y64zIWAA9Y=; b=DmgzlQpGxYBhIBobJH1/2DvmKWOOYvAh74/xIJCN+JT0tyZNUrcoZ3DpfNpHljsFXP m8Ve0Lj+R3lxT3UG8mHPKVXJ4KSeRid579gvI8wMvqjmYf6Zm1A7u+Spmh8l8IKqk5Eh WIg20zg2w47NgM7xkJ8Sb5TSe7Tkfv1AERPhS7IBZWz34KVBNKL7ItJRXeZIWQg+unfA f+8IdNicvyOXcA8w2qIGxFBMJFs37IYTZ00x4yk0jkx1rppW5vQNyjc0D/GZ8FKdnXkL jzNQIDy7rhJgRKiHDGDcnT7+914H1Ebvi33xR43EBmfOaQVOYQSRZTndxs38qIGjluao L8RA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531N44GZDQtzNvP6iYeDyWohGFxHOsxcc3lbrymOX2TkBtQoTDBS 3t8kIU24GkotptGvY9g+qgUjIyUjSYGbV5rWWr8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxo7naYEKU+ns7Sbl97vmedqMErnkZSHcCeRqrxFRnrfAGmAIFRbeXei7iDwmUVlypx/RoJRWitXxw/9ulqdw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:10d6:: with SMTP id z22mr12327373oto.62.1615040675056; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 06:24:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <41D23C74-6501-4FF8-BC34-F4B46E79DE5B@gmail.com> <CAG99temcUovZdv3t30E4xxxbg2BGXu5FJMocLQEc0JdMVAsLyQ@mail.gmail.com> <7FADB4C9-F810-48F8-925C-935BB15A0DCD@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7FADB4C9-F810-48F8-925C-935BB15A0DCD@cisco.com>
From: Miya Kohno <miya.kohno@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 23:24:24 +0900
Message-ID: <CAG99tek=f3R6Gfw92RhmJtFxoTYK4OLHqaD42qoi6PTvpHeCAQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
Cc: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>, dmm <dmm@ietf.org>, "dmm-chairs@ietf.org" <dmm-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bc0eb705bcdef5f2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/broGjRJ4dDCK9QmrK21wHjmZOyQ>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for Agenda: IETF110 DMM
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 14:24:38 -0000

Thank you, Sri. I will prepare to present.

Miya

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 3:22 AM Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <sgundave@cisco.com>
wrote:

> Hi Miya,
>
>
>
> Yes, we need some review feedback, before we can initiate any adoption
> call.  Please present this in the WG meeting and we can ask some folks to
> sign-up for reviews.
>
>
>
> All – Please review and post your feedback on the WG mailer.
>
>
>
> Sri
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Miya Kohno <miya.kohno@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, March 3, 2021 at 10:12 PM
> *To: *Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
> *Cc: *dmm <dmm@ietf.org>, "dmm-chairs@ietf.org" <dmm-chairs@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [DMM] Call for Agenda: IETF110 DMM
> *Resent-From: *<alias-bounces@ietf.org>
> *Resent-To: *<maxpassion@gmail.com>, Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com>,
> <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
> *Resent-Date: *Wednesday, March 3, 2021 at 10:12 PM
>
>
>
> Hi DMM chairs and DMMers,
>
>
>
> I'm wondering how to proceed the draft "Architecture Discussion on SRv6
> Mobile User plane".
>
>   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch-03
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/materials/slides-109-dmm-architecture-discussion-on-srv6-mobile-user-plane-01.pdf
>
>
>
> As mobile architecture entities become more distributed, they have the
> potential to be integrated as the platforms for edge/distributed computing
> and new SLA delivery mechanisms, but for that, I think it is essential to
> consider this across domains and across layers.
>
>
>
> Why SRv6? Because it can include any functionality of any overlays
> (GENEVE, VXLAN, NSH, GTP-U..) with a single common dataplane.
>
>
>
> I would appreciate your comments and suggestions.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Miya
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:25 PM Satoru Matsushima <
> satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> DMM meeting in IETF110 online will be held at March 8th 1600-1800 UTC.
> If you have any topic for the IETF110 DMM meeting, please send the chairs
> your topic with the title and the presenter.
>
> Cheers,
> --satoru
>
> > On Jan 22, 2021, at 11:07, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool <
> session-request@ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Sri Gundavelli,
> a Chair of the dmm working group.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > Working Group Name: Distributed Mobility Management
> > Area Name: Internet Area
> > Session Requester: Sri Gundavelli
> >
> >
> > Number of Sessions: 1
> > Length of Session(s):  2 Hours
> > Number of Attendees: 25
> > Conflicts to Avoid:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > People who must be present:
> > Sri Gundavelli
> > Erik Kline
> > Dapeng Liu
> > Satoru Matsushima
> >
> > Resources Requested:
> >
> > Special Requests:
> > Preferred days: Monday or Tuesday
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
>