Re: [DMM] New Version Notification for draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum-01.txt
"Z.W. Yan" <yan@cnnic.cn> Thu, 23 April 2015 03:48 UTC
Return-Path: <yan@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3AE1B2E8C for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 20:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.939
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.939 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eLg1CZgnO06H for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 20:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D691B2DFD for <dmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 20:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from JoyYan (unknown [218.241.111.47]) by ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0D5JXF_azhVgqw3AA--.13354S2; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:48:15 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:48:12 +0800
From: "Z.W. Yan" <yan@cnnic.cn>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>, dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
References: <201504131333451125705@cnnic.cn>
Message-ID: <201504231148123033203@cnnic.cn>
X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 22 [cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====003_Dragon508785571843_====="
X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0D5JXF_azhVgqw3AA--.13354S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7Ar17KF43Kw1fAw4fJw1UWrg_yoW8Kr4fpF s0vr1rCrn5C3WIy3ykuw12qa1jkFZ5ZrZrG34Ygr1Yka45JF10yr10ka1akFWUuwn5JF15 tr4a9r4DA3Z0qrJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUU9Yb7Iv0xC_KF4lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw A2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Xr0_Ar1l84ACjcxK6xII jxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Cr0_Gr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_Cr1j6rxdM28EF7xvwV C2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40E42I2 6xC2a48xMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4I kC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFcxC0VAYjxAxZF0Ew4CEw7xC0wACY4xI 67k04243AVC20s07MxkIecxEwVAFwVW8GwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7x kEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r106r1rMI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E 67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF0_Jw1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCw CI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rW3Jr0E 3s1lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JbIYCT nIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxU4AhLDUUUU
X-CM-SenderInfo: x1dqqupqqluhdfq/
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/dsMchWJ7_LDg6l-u2TeTfUH0ij4>
Cc: Jong-Hyouk Lee <hurryon@gmail.com>, xl <xl@cnnic.cn>
Subject: Re: [DMM] New Version Notification for draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 03:48:25 -0000
Hi, Alex, Thank you for your attention. Exectly, IPv6 address (or prefix) renumbering is very necesary to be considered in many scenarios (especially when we talk about mobility management). About your concerns: 1)when a Host is renumbered, will the new address become Fixed, Sustained or Nomadic? We mentioned here is the Fixed IP address (the HoA). 2)is this breaking ondemand mobility, or supporting ondemand mobility? In a way, this is a supporting of the ondemand mobility because this draft aims to notify or configure the new HoA on the MN ASAP. Besides, we are now polishing our draft to address the session connecnivity and handover of the address(prefix). Thank you. Zhiwei 2015-04-23 Z.W. Yan 发件人： Alexandru Petrescu 发送时间： 2015-04-22 04:15:01 收件人： dmm 抄送： 主题： Re: [DMM] New Version Notification for draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum-01.txt Le 13/04/2015 07:33, Z.W. Yan a écrit : > Hi, all, > During the Dallas meeting, we introduced the issue of HNP-renumbering in PMIPv6 and heard some positive voices. > In order to present it more clearly and collect more comments, > we updated the draft with the 01 version. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum-01 > Any comments from you are all welcome. > Thanks. > Zhiwei Yan > > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > Hi, The idea of renumbering a PMIPv6 network (update each prefix for each MN-ID) makes sense. The use-cases described in the draft are necessary. In other WGs like Homenet and Anima, there is ongoing discussion about new Renumbering procedures in Enterprise and in Home, whereas this would be in a Mobile network like 3GPP. The draft presents diagrams of message exchanges as well as brief descriptions of message formats; this is to be implemented with DHCPv6 and RA, among others. I would like to ask you this: when a Host is renumbered, will the new address become Fixed, Sustained or Nomadic? I would also like to ask this: is this breaking ondemand mobility, or supporting ondemand mobility? There is a nit "Trigged". Alex _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
- [DMM] New Version Notification for draft-yan-dmm-… Z.W. Yan
- Re: [DMM] New Version Notification for draft-yan-… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [DMM] New Version Notification for draft-yan-… Z.W. Yan