Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 03 September 2014 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9611A000E for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HxJs28f4CMFE for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A7D01A0062 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4DB88127 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clemson.local (c-76-21-129-88.hsd1.md.comcast.net [76.21.129.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8AB136811D for <dmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5407422F.2010700@innovationslab.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 12:30:39 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dmm@ietf.org
References: <53D17F75.3030207@gmail.com> <53D7A012.2050700@gmail.com> <53D8AAE0.4040301@gmail.com> <2E9AF0DF-8B1A-475B-B5FB-ED5E419F0085@yegin.org> <53EB4F10.1040502@gmail.com> <A02C6954-3EC9-443F-ACC3-4A635EC79EFC@yegin.org> <53F35B44.1090808@gmail.com> <1E1DFA1F-8BC5-474B-A792-A8681A99D094@yegin.org> <72DAF3D2-05D9-4A1E-9185-7265AA915075@gmail.com> <CAC8QAcegx1QPATsrPS-v-dkoLbaSTNqE3M+BbrYJPHrCFKMyXA@mail.gmail.com> <5404BC3D.1000406@gmail.com> <CAC8QAccqjXHogC44iOBO5bDccFBRixgcgrQU=hst8ZYGM3Y5xA@mail.gmail.com> <5406A20F.60604@gmail.com> <CAC8QAccBSXSsydagekNHnBbaYvmtTdm=xv5aEE64c+=9X2Fp9w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAccBSXSsydagekNHnBbaYvmtTdm=xv5aEE64c+=9X2Fp9w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3hsFhRJrSaQsiqUhaW9Ukw7vWl0d20qIL"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/h-kNTf0rVjBKSqXcjWe3twdG1ZQ
Subject: Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:30:49 -0000

Just for clarification...

On 9/3/14 12:22 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:

> 
> I am also concerned on the time DMM is taking on dressing up the
> charter text. I remind you on what Jari Arkko who is founding AD for
> DMM said in Toronto admin plenary:
> WGs should have  solution work from day 1.

Not "should", but rather "could".  Not all WGs need to have
requirements, frameworks, architecture, etc. That is why this type of
discussion during charter development is important.

> 
> He also emphasized importance of running code.

Running code is good thing.  So is an understanding of customer needs
(in this case, other SDOs).

Regards,
Brian