IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Wed, 30 August 2017 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02927132A80; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pulRBojtTjD8; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x242.google.com (mail-yw0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45962132A89; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x242.google.com with SMTP id s187so4833695ywf.2; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=h72BIGPEjZAdBpKTktBLYOXOF8Dzznh4ePlvWRNkNOM=; b=Ll7aOp/dsVrsMoeSSUiuERqzQPQMR/GNm7Ax/WFYB4UOaKirte6mwE25JPyW7vSF+Y Q4cizAsBGNd3Qvw53Atjbd6fZEdWXk1+Tqc6cXDTJ7cK7RdyNyQUunUkVHtWltxckHiq 0SLWgavLZLIazBOR+y4UlOBw8JgR/vLef1YSkbXzT2tHXh2qTETllQ5fR844RqqVIIcg QBRXkPLOgZIK76GRsegcDy9EWYUphZSRWS1GMb8YO/8Gy6XkwEF/ZVkcsMIl3cQhJuyR 0TMAOyz4vOEU5gG+rsmuUeM3E+QeWZL9H07Ej5AAE+smKSEljxWq9jcQ+WhAt3FvHjPz /HfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=h72BIGPEjZAdBpKTktBLYOXOF8Dzznh4ePlvWRNkNOM=; b=b7Kd/toe9iy3jABYWcenVbexy2p8aYZZ+VPq8pDp6JeYJBPIkrVyvMysE2kPLEpDbr XXcd+z/G1wjNqyx8LN6dDbVVvUw6SjdFc3xY2VPlaZTiPB/qYwUGq3Jy88m5bLK7qNRy engEBUea6V9XkuSwSoNNfJNvRB3tjrJZW0UNfVJzJYXxOzK++RktOOAx5HQIp+NmfxzB nlmidJcM+C9E0JG21Pzjz6NPV539KJmrQzhFB/UpN8bIQ0xg8ICb0trsicUL2Fvva2GN l8C843QSK0PiSxmvS5C8sPtF6ORgZI16DzJqsDNAex4+GKM+JFtBR/+N5wsxVlJC3063 iSQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5ikXVBNbhhyVqw9A37UIOJX0o8gG1Og58BOIZ3obLPirf5/vLL4 6ODgfH7cg9Yx/z92ynYS1Q==
X-Received: by 10.37.178.155 with SMTP id k27mr2321013ybj.218.1504126671440; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.5] (45-19-110-76.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net. [45.19.110.76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o17sm2347764ywd.37.2017.08.30.13.57.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Aug 2017 13:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9790D9AB-A943-420B-923D-5EF87F4A4D4C@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 16:57:49 -0400
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "max.ldp" <max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com>, draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids@ietf.org, dmm-chairs@ietf.org, dmm@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C2189220-7650-4BD2-89CF-02B7AC230FE6@gmail.com>
References: <148721684794.31572.814060328381329269.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9790D9AB-A943-420B-923D-5EF87F4A4D4C@nostrum.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/nGM4xNdFhorv0__R1uMdkqI1Dlc>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 20:57:55 -0000

> On Aug 30, 2017, at 3:55 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> I apologize for taking a while to circle back on this—I missed the fact that there was an update.
> 
> Version 5 changes the assertion that “some of these identifiers” may be considered private information to simply saying mobile identifiers are private information, and changes the lower-case “should" encrypt to a MUST. That resolves my DISCUSS point. I will clear.

Thanks a lot Ben for checking and clearing.

Regards
Suresh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email