IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..

Marco Liebsch <Marco.Liebsch@neclab.eu> Wed, 10 September 2014 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <Marco.Liebsch@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782151A6FDD for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 06:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.254
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.254 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bFQaT_aE3657 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 06:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18F341A00D7 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 06:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961D3107EA4; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:29:42 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UFIhIOqnfT3j; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:29:42 +0200 (CEST)
X-ENC: Last-Hop-TLS-encrypted
X-ENC: Last-Hop-TLS-encrypted
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (enceladus.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B28B107E9E; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:29:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from DAPHNIS.office.hd ([169.254.2.88]) by ENCELADUS.office.hd ([192.168.24.52]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:29:33 +0200
From: Marco Liebsch <Marco.Liebsch@neclab.eu>
To: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>, Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
Thread-Index: AQHPp4lB4DM2zhzjQk2BPAsjwbgBU5u2760AgAE+DgCACXRoAIAMxHwAgAAPCACACYjsAIAT+UaAgAAUBoCAAHpbAIAAL/CAgAG1KoCAAI37gIAAvK4AgAACNICAAAWVAIAACByAgAAUmACAAAWVAIABAUAAgAF6iICAAIw+AIAEC7GAgAC2QwCAAP+QgIAAvvIAgAAOp4CAAALBAIABLIIQ
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:29:34 +0000
Message-ID: <69756203DDDDE64E987BC4F70B71A26D91A58AC3@DAPHNIS.office.hd>
References: <D034B8C3.1627CC%sgundave@cisco.com> <D034BE1C.1627FA%sgundave@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D034BE1C.1627FA%sgundave@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.6.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/pNmtaq6-JOQ4RuXy_D7Zc2JgvYk
Cc: Vijay Devarapalli <dvijay@rocketmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:29:46 -0000

It seems the MNID is somehow overloaded to carry both, node-specific IDs, e.g. MAC, as well as subscriber IDs, which is the IMSI.
There may be value in adding the IMEI to the list of possible types of node-specific IDs. 

marco

>-----Original Message-----
>From: dmm [mailto:dmm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli
>(sgundave)
>Sent: Dienstag, 9. September 2014 23:30
>To: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave); Charlie Perkins; dmm@ietf.org
>Cc: Vijay Devarapalli
>Subject: Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
>
>Two more comments.
>
>
>
>4.) I'd also use sub-type value of (2) for IMSI. Just to align with the sub-types
>defined for MN Id defined for ICMP. I suspect there are some implementations
>already using sub-type (2). Please see the other thread.
>
>
>5.) For each of the sub-types, we need text including examples and some
>explanation on how they are used.
>
>
>Sri
>
>
>
>On 9/9/14 2:20 PM, "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi Charlie,
>>
>>This is good. Thanks.
>>
>>
>>1.) If EUI-48 and EUI-64 addresses are derived of a 48-bit IEEE 802.2
>>address, why do we need to two sub-types ? Why not have just one
>>sub-type for mac based identifiers ?
>>
>>2.) Sub type value (1) is currently used. Its currently overloaded for
>>IMSI-NAI (3GPP specs) and generic NAI based identifiers. Given the
>>definition of new sub-types, we need some text explaining the
>>motivation
>>
>>3.) Proposed Sub-type value of (2) for IPv6 address. What exactly is
>>this ? Are these CGA-based IPv6 addresses ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                     New Mobile Node Identifier Types
>>
>>               +-----------------+------------------------+
>>               | Identifier Type | Identifier Type Number |
>>               +-----------------+------------------------+
>>               | IPv6 Address    | 2                      |
>>               |                 |                        |
>>               | IMSI            | 3                      |
>>               |                 |                        |
>>               | P-TMSI          | 4                      |
>>               |                 |                        |
>>               | EUI-48 address  | 5                      |
>>               |                 |                        |
>>               | EUI-64 address  | 6                      |
>>               |                 |                        |
>>               | GUTI            | 7                      |
>>               +-----------------+------------------------+
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Regards
>>Sri
>>PS: Good to see Vijay back
>>
>>
>>On 9/9/14 1:28 PM, "Charlie Perkins" <charles.perkins@earthlink.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Hello folks,
>>>
>>>Here's the last Internet Draft that we did, long ago expired:
>>>http://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-perkins-mext-4283mnids-01.txt
>>>
>>>I'll resubmit it with a few updates as a personal draft to dmm.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Charlie P.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>dmm mailing list
>>dmm@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
>_______________________________________________
>dmm mailing list
>dmm@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email