Re: [DMM] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-05

CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Sat, 07 March 2020 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DCE3A1A8A for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 13:18:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=it.uc3m.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pk7LdbZmFV8O for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 13:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51B2A3A1A8C for <dmm@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Mar 2020 13:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id m25so7143564edq.8 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 13:18:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=it.uc3m.es; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DZC+kiBBvYx7VzJqCU1KqTOr+HJB5Q1/F58/ECiu6q8=; b=WvXsrSIybAMIFMmI4gAYCT7DvuGBEqvttOcitL7NQcEYGt0P5q7MwF6Sgph3jqwbUP KWhX0E0fRGpduPQ5i7qjFzoZgluwCaRzDIlJzaZ8koiXgWsIu8Rt6v6hMDNK8na/rcUG 8TV/3pknRj5jQ9uom+TFgTxIgcowydlIwTMK8DgQzfq1DAbVLgvCF7cy7JbV/OcGDJXE XwelvKXYQv1VbcywCC9NEvkzCnNHFdTbTUmvFXvlH2U9NMGg2YlEnzkYZqVux2lmLH30 wXjPfZKOAk8+cm21Gs/zgIirnLdPBu4J3Ze3ehCt0ndbyZw3CZb+laW+RTCg30RMs53w WXmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DZC+kiBBvYx7VzJqCU1KqTOr+HJB5Q1/F58/ECiu6q8=; b=qrYkv8ovO7zCVg8nO/EQWx3y6oBwmxh9BN9tzQveTHDOysWGQbXlA3KoJnPHu8lCG4 nc02gr5ukR4LpXpAOTKOBx+ge6xig71hmjDvJhZKrOYKE8Bs9lJOH/HWhvYUE0/szUAG 1zr1lCJGykhXcCA3/l5qUg95EZyU6aOyE5fcBKBBDkJaAKd+fNrSYWEN6AUUBaEQnuLH 1mmSxJuFEpfUBvQyCCQi4Hx9lItMaCRVAT3t3qpOpE6S25yy0emKY1iRODk/A/tOAiGy pV7V+JkrVNlz216gQA0CMN8RatortFeh7F8qv/2+jYYV+BQoxmi0Ok/Ex2/fQKIhb9CO Rtzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1deqo1pWDzFBzZ44gSdWH8nhFEMqoYWZOqJhsiuraR5roY4+sg EY3MojruX3dOLtlTWfAJ1mZqSng4kmPsxaUqyugxID966zs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: =?utf-8?q?ADFU+vuactAe/0/87UREG74SboUPFHSrTfGh0oc2abVk?= =?utf-8?q?8cTI5o2kph40S2/yg0ialzaKdka/gq7WpopZBfst20BBq2Q=3D?=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:128c:: with SMTP id w12mr10035578edv.368.1583615884404; Sat, 07 Mar 2020 13:18:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158281546210.2262.1845082722013562869@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158281546210.2262.1845082722013562869@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2020 22:17:46 +0100
Message-ID: <CALypLp-pB6zgJfZyoOxC7Yeh8UYKWfWR=WMwd1zeTh_NMQf=Ew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr>
Cc: secdir <secdir@ietf.org>, dmm <dmm@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000040472305a04a4e3b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/sLgLkoWXP7astlOyitHjQg9OJVg>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-05
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 21:18:08 -0000

Hi Vincent,

Thanks a lot for your review. Please see inline below for my comments.

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 3:57 PM Vincent Roca via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Reviewer: Vincent Roca
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> Hello,
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> Summary: Has Nits
>
> Thank you for the clarification of the Security Considerations section.
> I just have a minor comment and a typo.
>
> - It is said (section 6):
>   "The CMD SHOULD use a pacing approach to limit
>    this amplification risk."
> I agree, but where do you intend to apply pacing? In the incoming queue
> (i.e.,
> by delaying some PBU/PBA messages) or in the outgoing queue (i.e., to limit
> output traffic), or both? It's a bit unclear.
>

[CB] I meant limiting the output traffic. I've clarified this in version
-06 (to be submitted soon).


>
> - Typo: remove one "exist" in sentence: "there may exist multiple previous
> (e.g., k) MAARs exist."
>
> [CB] Fixed, thanks.

Thanks again for your comments.

Carlos


> Regards,    Vincent
>
>
>