[DMM] on draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility-04 ..
"jouni.nospam" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Mon, 14 November 2016 07:32 UTC
Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF941296CE for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:32:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0PJJsBdPLKik for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:32:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x231.google.com (mail-pf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 138531296E7 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:32:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id d2so28157739pfd.0 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:32:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :cc:to; bh=6e/MzHblhRhMCdfRIlMfoS1mhOmLtn5nZXTJ31ah9n4=; b=gYANrmqYAZEOQkzxwK6RoYKrkzeqgUMYX6dUqh7c+aZWPK5eX/sJdKMCMyJ1sjehKO SYp02OB0N4NOF9cu8jP4PT7nkd7p3cHywmsH2ut6e46TrjcsKyKo+oNkgLlMkktZK7nx S3/qeZpdCpONqkA/Vs+csQsIR49IVo9PtA16Bzjh3a5fldWBRMEWqTNxbTaEp0qSs6hf H34EAjK0/O9fbm7V7ow7Dy31f0h2Z2pYePCX3A8dgC7nyiHO1kbzgIvjxZ7umtMZhv97 xRFPDXlJX8BThrKfw0mELPcNqLaxTqBxPsghWr54U+Bp8sM/9T8A7Cy/T6EVK7BOnVHM VaEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:cc:to; bh=6e/MzHblhRhMCdfRIlMfoS1mhOmLtn5nZXTJ31ah9n4=; b=AwfA8qZl/SHTcnNmqOl5wQQQxhZzLNKZ4ehE84GDRz5TBaAhEZwn2slS9qJCj5Ua/F yizHMP2dqgJ0nRgBtqpFBCbyYX20X16Z6mgzdQzLt+1Q16EcXeiW/Q5//RF50hpD+VHP ETfngBRvYgFKDjvgRsQS0Kj52qhCmyPmZGjZu6sNJx2K7WLGfU+IOqazrcMTm6qBvyzO lBnjBIj7rMn7+/ifQ2epvUhk620qZtr0Uifg+OV2d8d+Feoxw/Hv25RE246PaZD6+Dv7 cFVOhvGaIK4ppTEsnEZtGzAjQpFcNO7WrMQNLxT9i35weIzbFcZsONY/nd8F4r6TVJe+ E/hQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvd8tuoWAWM7QX59V/+d+xRYvkHeQ5H4CQdeXEEbVVR5YA9K7i6j15grdvR+JFvTxw==
X-Received: by 10.98.88.4 with SMTP id m4mr5867138pfb.81.1479108725668; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:32:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from t2001067c03700128dc4d21cbeb438f4c.v6.meeting.ietf.org ([2001:67c:370:128:dc4d:21cb:eb43:8f4c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fg2sm32760707pad.23.2016.11.13.23.32.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:32:04 -0800 (PST)
From: "jouni.nospam" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Message-Id: <A7B694DB-1513-4E22-BAE3-E74EF08CF84E@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 23:31:59 -0800
To: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/tlmY_CBplwNO6M9zZRrTsWIMddI>
Cc: "\"刘大鹏(鹏成)\"" <max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com>
Subject: [DMM] on draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility-04 ..
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 07:32:13 -0000
Folks, We had a fruitful discussion on this draft at DMM meeting. Before going for the adoption call the authors need to take a look at RFC7934 recommendations and modify the draft accordingly. We had a straw-man poll on whether folks like the draft proposed solution in general and see it useful and whether the WG should work on it. There was 6 for yes and 0 for no. - JOuni & Dapeng
- [DMM] on draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility-0… jouni.nospam