[dna] DNA working group completion

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 16 October 2009 10:08 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: dna@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dna@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4574A3A679F for <dna@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tCHQVIICpEjM for <dna@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662483A67A1 for <dna@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F58D49B3; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:08:07 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eBS7AkyEq9vW; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:08:06 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE21CD4904; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:08:05 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4AD84605.8050903@piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:08:05 +0300
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: DNA <dna@eng.monash.edu.au>, dna@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [dna] DNA working group completion
X-BeenThere: dna@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNA working group mailing list <dna.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dna>, <mailto:dna-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dna>
List-Post: <mailto:dna@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dna-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dna>, <mailto:dna-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:08:04 -0000

Now that the simple DNA document has been sent to IETF last call, I 
wanted to talk to you about the status of the working group. It has 
taken a long time, but we are finally there! I am sure there will be 
small issues in the IESG review, but I do not see any major problems. 
Thank you everyone who made this happen, Suresh you in particular have 
done a lot of work on this!

But lets talk about the next steps. My inclination would be to say that 
we've completed our main task and that we can close the working group. A 
successful closure. Any follow-up documents (tentative, the experimental 
full protocol) can be submitted as individual submissions and I'd be 
happy to take them forward. But watching the energy level of the group 
dissipate over the years, I do not believe we have a reason to keep a 
formal working group alive. Obviously the mailing list should be kept alive.

Thoughts?

Jari