[dna] Applicability statement for Simple DNA (Providing text to resolve issue #11)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Tue, 23 September 2008 15:05 UTC

Return-Path: <dna-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dna-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dna-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17D33A6A47; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dna@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dna@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECDB3A6A47 for <dna@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PON1O6vRQ1on for <dna@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr1.ericy.com (imr1.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D2D3A69E6 for <dna@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw750.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.77.50]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m8NF4xRF028782; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:04:59 -0500
Received: from eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se ([138.85.77.51]) by eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:04:56 -0500
Received: from [142.133.10.113] ([142.133.10.113]) by eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:04:55 -0500
Message-ID: <48D905B2.4050108@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:05:22 -0400
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dna@ietf.org, JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@gmail.com>, JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@samsung.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2008 15:04:55.0962 (UTC) FILETIME=[BD428FA0:01C91D8D]
Subject: [dna] Applicability statement for Simple DNA (Providing text to resolve issue #11)
X-BeenThere: dna@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNA working group mailing list <dna.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dna>, <mailto:dna-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dna>
List-Post: <mailto:dna@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dna-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dna>, <mailto:dna-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: dna-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dna-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Folks,

   I propose to add the following text to a new section called
"Applicability" to resolve issue #11. The previous applicability section
will be moved into a new section called "Working assumptions".

NEW TEXT:
=========

    The Simple DNA protocol is provides substantial benefits in some
    scenarios and does not provide any benefit at all in certain other
    scenarios.  This is intentional as Simple DNA was designed for
    simplicity rather than completeness.  In particular, the Simple DNA
    protocol provides maximum benefits when a host moves between a small
    set of known links.  When a host moves to a completely new link that
    is previously unknown, the performance of the Simple DNA protocol
    will be identical to that using standard neighbor discovery
    procedures [RFC4861].

If you have any issues with this text, please respond to this mail on list.

Thanks
Suresh

_______________________________________________
dna mailing list
dna@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dna