Return-Path: X-Original-To: dns-at-ietf@mail2.ietf.org Delivered-To: dns-at-ietf@mail2.ietf.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9227A83889FC for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 07:28:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hardakers.net Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dhfbywuy-N7m for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 07:28:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [107.220.113.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13F348388891 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 07:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (rtr-guestwired.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.144.1]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3EA3B20601; Wed, 05 Nov 2025 07:26:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.hardakers.net 3EA3B20601 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardakers.net; s=default; t=1762356412; bh=X4LBSnWvW6C2bprvFRqE+NBnywMhxL3an2nJE5mUfIM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=UQ6C9vVYeQoHtTd64eZk5IkyYegr24RKIybzjsPz7+sf/j4Y4tSdFphFSh7CsVssd smRsC/XfIShI+Wnr/DF1vc698kERoe/WXJEEynjgAN9o7ZXmGf2saQOmcE2sNSzSB/ 3hcpnTpByG6RE7f8CRehA9kxhU8G36g41kkt7sv4= From: Wes Hardaker To: Paul Hoffman In-Reply-To: <0CC80FE5-83D5-4E5C-8169-4F97E3237E01@proper.com> (Paul Hoffman's message of "Wed, 05 Nov 2025 07:33:05 -0500") References: <0CC80FE5-83D5-4E5C-8169-4F97E3237E01@proper.com> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 07:26:50 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-ID-Hash: T7XA4LOJLCXVE7FWBOM7WQ4PVZRNN2KD X-Message-ID-Hash: T7XA4LOJLCXVE7FWBOM7WQ4PVZRNN2KD X-MailFrom: wjhns1@hardakers.net X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: Wes Hardaker , dns-at-ietf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5Bdns-at-ietf=5D_Re=3A_Happy_IETF-124_Wednesday!__Let=27s_talk_ab?= =?utf-8?q?out_communication?= List-Id: "This list is to discuss the structure of DNS work in the IETF, and DNSOP in particular." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Paul Hoffman writes: > Thanks, Wes. Related to this is how progress is made: WG sessions > vs. mailing list discussion. Is the DNS community different on this > than other IETF communities? Fair point. Maybe the following question would help for that too: How many weeks behind are you in unread mail in DNS mailing lists? (min vs max vs mean vs medium vs stdev left as an exercise to the writer) And: do you follow github issues? -- Wes Hardaker Google