Re: [dns-dir] Draft requesting reservation of special-use domain names

Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl> Thu, 28 November 2013 09:47 UTC

Return-Path: <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EEE1A1F58 for <dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:47:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fk8lK6WbuzRA for <dns-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:47:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from open.nlnetlabs.nl (open.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A701A1F4A for <dns-dir@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:47:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1:7211:24ff:fe8c:627a] ([IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1:7211:24ff:fe8c:627a]) (authenticated bits=0) by open.nlnetlabs.nl (8.14.7/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rAS9kxWW014176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:47:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olaf@NLnetLabs.nl)
Authentication-Results: open.nlnetlabs.nl; dmarc=none header.from=NLnetLabs.nl
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 open.nlnetlabs.nl rAS9kxWW014176
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1385632022; bh=8seryk5xpGdjhX9J1T0gn61ObYKlvDR9D/eycFz0G5k=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=wpKGAgaSANxtyZFIiZIlh4PKht9EyIoYcApZ7v2f+M5Kp79ojELYgz8qnxTE8uZ1n s+B0kS6Iw8MAO9hGBWv2jByHbwcqI22ljsQGKRjyjTdANqocOqH1y6mA2eflDGfmti 7J4l0zGSgmFqFZG47dBaP9O3RccmdWnwg+CkBh7E=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CE3F11B7-B58C-4BE5-86E2-3B47028A1A0A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <F7DEECA9-5E88-4888-986B-D63DC66FA8B9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:46:59 +0100
Message-Id: <3387707A-201E-490C-9B65-3EB6B35DA8E1@NLnetLabs.nl>
References: <5286231D.4030104@innovationslab.net> <52863898.5080100@innovationslab.net> <8F0B436C-85D2-4566-A80B-40710DF9D476@ogud.com> <B6B47E1A-678D-4856-BE54-E34ADC7E98F8@townsley.net> <73C44405-6048-4031-9FA5-BCDFA70160A4@frobbit.se> <84D57F70-CCA3-4412-989E-0FAB089ECEEF@gmail.com> <31C42EE0-8D1F-4D7C-8E8C-43ACE5F61B04@frobbit.se> <528D2782.4070208@sonic.net> <B42C50EA-39CE-415E-9CBA-0F0471CAC519@NLnetLabs.nl> <F7DEECA9-5E88-4888-986B-D63DC66FA8B9@gmail.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (open.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1::1]); Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:47:02 +0100 (CET)
Cc: IETF DNS Directorate <dns-dir@ietf.org>, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>
Subject: Re: [dns-dir] Draft requesting reservation of special-use domain names
X-BeenThere: dns-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNS directorate discussion list <dns-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir>, <mailto:dns-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:47:09 -0000

On 28 nov. 2013, at 01:57, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is there some reason to think those names might be delegated from the root?  My understanding is that the review process for name delegation would identify such names as "not to be delegated" if there is significant use now, otherwise, they are safe to delegate. 

At this moment .corp and .home are ‘on-hold’ (indefinitely?).

There is also an SSAC recommendation to have some of these strings permanently reserved, and SSAC is looking towards the IETF (correct Patrik?)

—Olaf